1979
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1979.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological grade and other prognostic factors in relation to survival of patients with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-year survival (Table I) decreased steadily with both increasing stage (Langlands & Kerr, 1978) and grade (Freedman et al, 1979). Tumour size increased with increasing grade (I, 2*4cm+ 1 4; II, 3 0 cm+ 1-4; JII,3A4 cm+ 1.6) in keeping with Fisher et al (1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The 5-year survival (Table I) decreased steadily with both increasing stage (Langlands & Kerr, 1978) and grade (Freedman et al, 1979). Tumour size increased with increasing grade (I, 2*4cm+ 1 4; II, 3 0 cm+ 1-4; JII,3A4 cm+ 1.6) in keeping with Fisher et al (1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…6 Histologic grade is strongly correlated with prognosis, and is correlated with both disease-free and overall survival. [20][21][22][23] The authors of the original study stressed that this grading system had clinical utility for both invasive lobular carcinoma and special type cancers. This was further validated by the work of Sastre-Garau et al, 24 who showed that histologic grade is as important for prognosis in invasive lobular carcinoma as it is in invasive ductal carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear hyperchromatism and mitosis is the factor of importance to grading in this respect. This factor also differentiated between RE+ and RE-carcinomas in this material.PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CARCINOMA iS related to the histological grade of the primary tumour (Freedman et al, 1979). The TNM stage (International Union against Cancer, 1972) at which a tumour presents is also a reflection of its histological grade (Thoresen et al, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%