1939
DOI: 10.1086/334827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological Study of the Developing Fruit of the Sour Cherry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
66
0
5

Year Published

1954
1954
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study may imply a distinct carbohydrate source:sink relationship in 'Sweetheart' relative to 'Van', where carbohydrate source is limiting potential fruit size and earlier thinning results in quality benefits such as increased size -perhaps due to greater resource availability for cell division given that cell division is complete within 10 days of full bloom (Tukey & Young 1939) and that no similar decline was seen in firmness, TSS or TA. That potential fruit size is set early in the fruit development ontogeny is tacitly supported by the lack of considerable difference in size between the 1 and 2 bud/spur treatments in either variety whilst firmness was significantly higher in the 1 than the 2 bud/spur treatments in both varieties in one season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The results of this study may imply a distinct carbohydrate source:sink relationship in 'Sweetheart' relative to 'Van', where carbohydrate source is limiting potential fruit size and earlier thinning results in quality benefits such as increased size -perhaps due to greater resource availability for cell division given that cell division is complete within 10 days of full bloom (Tukey & Young 1939) and that no similar decline was seen in firmness, TSS or TA. That potential fruit size is set early in the fruit development ontogeny is tacitly supported by the lack of considerable difference in size between the 1 and 2 bud/spur treatments in either variety whilst firmness was significantly higher in the 1 than the 2 bud/spur treatments in both varieties in one season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…and the drupelet of Rubus sp. (Rosaceae) (Tukey and Young 1939;Sterling 1953, Reeve 1954a, 1954bZieliński et al 2010). The shape of sclereids forming the outer endocarp layer is typical for the subg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Reeve (1954b) such cells forming distinct zone on the outer margin of the endocarp can be described as transition sclereids. According to Tukey and Young (1939), the line of demarcation between that portion of the pericarp which is destined to become stony and that which is to remain fleshy is discernible even at the beginning of fruit development because the cells of the former are smaller than those of the latter. According to the same authors, the cells of the stony pericarp remain relatively smaller into maturity, and this was confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao realizar o estudo ontogenético de frutos carnosos, principalmente drupas, é comum a divisão em períodos de crescimento (Lilleland 1930, 1932, 1933, Tukey & Young 1939, Nitsch 1953. Esses autores reconheceram o ovário e mais três períodos distintos de crescimento: no período I, ocorre um rápido aumento no tamanho do fruto e tegumentos seminais; no período II, o embrião diferencia-se, embora o fruto diminua sua velocidade de crescimento; no período III, o embrião já está formado, porém o fruto retoma seu crescimento devido um grande alongamento celular no pericarpo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified