2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…26,32,44,34 Predictive computational models can also be used to attain a better understanding of the factors which may influence the clinical procedure. The computational model presented in this paper offers a framework for studying various aspects of MSDOG, the effect of implant design, the duration of the latency period, the rate of expansion, the duration of the maturation period etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…26,32,44,34 Predictive computational models can also be used to attain a better understanding of the factors which may influence the clinical procedure. The computational model presented in this paper offers a framework for studying various aspects of MSDOG, the effect of implant design, the duration of the latency period, the rate of expansion, the duration of the maturation period etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b). Zimmermann et al 44 carried out histological analyses on the fracture callus generated in a porcine model submitted to mandibular distraction. They adopted three different rates of expansion, 1, 2 and 4 mm/day, and concluded that higher rates lead to smaller bone tissue percentages after the whole period of distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1990) stressed the importance of the periosteum for mandibular lengthening. Zimmermann et al (2005) wrote that in distraction of rat and rabbit long bones and sheep mandible, new bone formation was predominantly seen in the sub-periosteal region in every case. Cope and Samchukov (2000) reported that in osteogenesis in alveolar distraction, either from the bone marrow or the periosteum, the modeling period continued almost for the initial 2 months, and after that consolidation period, secondary remodeling began.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of ossification is slower and bone graft stability is lower compared to intramembranous ossification and for this reason endochondral ossification occurs with a greater quantity of associated fiber tissue. Zimmermann et al [16] demonstrated that a greater formation of fibrous tissue occurs in situations of instability. The fact that endochondral ossification is slower also explains the greater amount of cartilage in non-decorticated animals at 9 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%