2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results corroborate with literature findings. [5717] In agreement with the study by Djasim et al .,[16] we found new bone trabeculae formation in all groups, filled with fibrovascular tissues, and where the bone trabeculae were aligned in the direction vector of OD we found on the central area a minor quantity of bone formation, that indicates the limits/border of preexisting bone, and diminishing on the central area direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results corroborate with literature findings. [5717] In agreement with the study by Djasim et al .,[16] we found new bone trabeculae formation in all groups, filled with fibrovascular tissues, and where the bone trabeculae were aligned in the direction vector of OD we found on the central area a minor quantity of bone formation, that indicates the limits/border of preexisting bone, and diminishing on the central area direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[1314] In the present study the protocol activation of the device was 0.7 mm/day that is suggested by literature. Activations of 0.5 to 1 mm/day result in new bone formation, but when within large distraction sites and with a shorter duration, OD has been shown to form fibrous connections,[1516] and this situation was not observed in this present investigation. The results of these investigations have been tabulated in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…No presente estudo, foi utilizado um protocolo de ativação do aparelho de 0,7 mm/dia, pois, segundo a literatura, ativações de 0,5 a 1mm/dia resultam em formação óssea, enquanto que distrações maiores e mais rápidas resultam em união fibrosa, fato não observado nesta investigação. 9,15,16 Apesar de estarem bem descritos e consagrados os eventos que ocorrem durante o processo de alongamento ósseo por DO, inclusive quando da irradiação com laser, julgou-se importante a realização deste estudo, a fim de avaliar as características físicas e histológicas do osso neoformado com e sem irradiação com laser 5,6,17 . Os resultados foram compilados e expressos conforme se apresenta no Quadro 2.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Further, the studies [5,6] provide the advantages of continuous DO for bone regeneration acceleration. For complex deformations, surgical methods are applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%