2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14206049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical and Microtomographic Comparison between Autogenous and Xenogenous Bone Blocks for Mandibular Lateral Augmentation in Rabbits

Abstract: Background: The volumetric and biological behaviors of equine block grafts compared with autogenous block grafts have not yet been assessed. Hence, the aim of the present study was to compare—by means of histomorphometry, immunohistochemistry and microtomography—the graft incorporation and remodeling processes of autogenous and equine xenogenous bone blocks used for mandibular lateral augmentation in rabbits. Methods: Autogenous bone grafts harvested from the iliac bony crest and equine block grafts were secur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the present study, in that experiment, the bone grew within the graft onto the trabeculae, up to the surface. In another rabbit experiment [34], equine block grafts were compared with autogenous block grafts. While the two showed similar percentages of newly formed bone, volume maintenance and graft incorporation were better in the autologous compared to the xenogeneic graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the present study, in that experiment, the bone grew within the graft onto the trabeculae, up to the surface. In another rabbit experiment [34], equine block grafts were compared with autogenous block grafts. While the two showed similar percentages of newly formed bone, volume maintenance and graft incorporation were better in the autologous compared to the xenogeneic graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a viable alternative for replacing autogenous bone, the xenogeneic graft has been used in bone volume augmentation procedures [31][32][33][34][35][36], as it presents clinical advantages such as a decrease in surgical morbidity, greater technical ease, and the ability to conform and adapt the block following the anatomy of the recipient bed [31,[37][38][39]. To install the graft in the recipient bed, some surgical techniques can be used, such as bone grafts in onlay blocks, osteogenic distraction, and particulate bone grafts associated with titanium meshes or collagen membranes [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cele din urmă însă, nu au demonstrat rezultate satisfăcătoare, îndeosebi în cazul unor adiţii mai mari [3]. Aceasta se datorează faptului că materialele respective au doar proprietăţi osteoconductive, care în urma aplicării în situsul operator conduc la o integrare parţială, cu formarea unui ţesut osteoid, format parţial din os, ţesut fibros și particule de grefă incapsulate [4]. Aceste rezultate au condus la dezvoltarea conceptelor de amestec a grefelor xenogene sau alogene cu rumeguș osos autogen (datorită proprietăţilor osteoinductive și osteogenice ale acestuia).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The latter, however, did not show satisfactory results, especially in the case of larger additions [3]. This is since these materials have only osteoconductive properties, which lead to a partial integration after application, with the formation of an osteoid tissue, partially formed of bone, fibrous tissue and encapsulated graft particles [4]. These results led to the development of concepts for mixing xenogeneic or allogeneic grafts with autogenous bone grafts (due to its osseoinductive and osteogenic properties).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using xenogenous bone blocks from both equine and autogenic sources for onlay mandibular augmentation in rabbits, a recent study compared the incorporation and remodeling processes. Although the bone volume and quality of the grafted area were superior for autogenous bone, the amount of new bone formation after 60 days was similar for autologous and xenogeneic bone blocks [29]. More recently, the healing of collagenated equine bone blocks used as either inlay or onlay for mandibular bone augmentation in rabbits has been assessed [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%