Major histocompatibility (MHC) class II antigen presenting molecules play a seminal role on professional antigen presenting cells in the T-cell activation process and therefore in regulating the immune response. The role of MHC class II expression on tumor cells, particularly tumor cells of mesenchymal or parenchymal origin has been more controversial. Nevertheless, there is a large body of literature indicating that tumor cell MHC class II can affect tumor development. Tumor cell MHC class II expression has been shown to mediate tumor antigen dependent anti-tumor T-cell activity 1,2) ; to mediate apoptosis 3); and to mediate tolerance.
4)Furthermore, there are numerous tumor associated mechanisms, in some cases mechanisms that are indisputably associated with tumor development, involved in tumor cell regulation of MHC class II. For example, mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity in melanoma is associated with high levels of expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR, the most important MHC class II molecule in humans.
5)Also, HLA-DR induction by interferon-gamma (IFN-g) is abolished or highly limited, depending on the cell type, in retinoblastoma protein (Rb)-defective tumor cells, including Rb-defective non-small cell lung cancer cells.
6-8)The histon deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, sodium butyrate and trichostatin A can induce MHC class II surface expression in tumor cells. 8,9) The requirement of IFN-g appears to be variable, but at a minimum, the combination of IFN-g treatment and the above HDAC inhibitors has always led to the rescue of MHC class II surface expression.10) However, this process has never been reported for a class I specific HDAC inhibitor and in particular has never been reported for an HDAC inhibitor in clinical trials. This is an important issue, because knowledge of the potential effect of an HDAC inhibitor, used for patient therapy, on MHC class II expression could affect the interpretations of clinical outcomes. The MS-275 class I HDAC inhibitor is currently being used in clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer (http://clinicaltrials.gov/). Thus, we determined whether MS-275 could contribute to the induction of surface HLA-DR on non-small cell lung carcinoma cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODSFor Fig. 2, H2009 non-small cell lung carcinoma cells were treated with 400 units IFN-g per ml for 48 h and analyzed by flow cytometry exactly as described.7) H2009 cells were cultured in RPMI, 10% fetal bovine serum, with pyruvate, penicillin, streptomycin and glutamate supplements. H2009 cells were treated with 1.6 mg/ml of MS-275 (Sigma-Aldrich) 24 h after the IFN-g treatment, i.e., for the last 24 h of the IFN-g treatment. For Fig. 3A, H2009 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and treated with IFN-g exactly as described.8) Cells were treated with 1.6 mg/ml of MS-275, as indicated, 4 h following the completion of the DNA transfection protocol. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after completion of the DNA transfection protocol. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)...