2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathologic Examination of Failed Grafts in Descemet's Stripping with Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5,17,18,19 Other possible interface abnormalities, such as blood, inflammatory or epithelial cells, metallic particles, calcareous degeneration, or retained Descemet membrane, have been reported. 11,17,[20][21][22][23] Although there have been a few small case series reporting an interface haze or opacity, this is the largest case series to describe the condition with its potential impact on visual outcomes. 18,19,[24][25][26][27] In this case series, there were no signs of inflammation, rejection, edema, or infiltrate in association with the interface opacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3,5,17,18,19 Other possible interface abnormalities, such as blood, inflammatory or epithelial cells, metallic particles, calcareous degeneration, or retained Descemet membrane, have been reported. 11,17,[20][21][22][23] Although there have been a few small case series reporting an interface haze or opacity, this is the largest case series to describe the condition with its potential impact on visual outcomes. 18,19,[24][25][26][27] In this case series, there were no signs of inflammation, rejection, edema, or infiltrate in association with the interface opacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, the retrocorneal fibrocellular tissue also was found in failed DSEK/Descemet's membrane stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) cases and was supposed as a potential cause of dislocation. 16,[24][25] In some researchers' opinions, the retrocorneal fibrocellular tissue is presumably secondary to debris dragged in during insertion of the folded graft, which may induce the cellular proliferation that forms at the interface. 24 This was inconsistent with our study as no graft insertion occurred in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,[24][25] In some researchers' opinions, the retrocorneal fibrocellular tissue is presumably secondary to debris dragged in during insertion of the folded graft, which may induce the cellular proliferation that forms at the interface. 24 This was inconsistent with our study as no graft insertion occurred in the control group. Wilson and associates 29 demonstrated that the introduction of ectopic epithelial tissue into corneal stroma showed subsequent proliferation of stromal keratocytes, and the appearance of myofibroblasts, which led to stromal remodeling and scarring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations