2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-1005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological Response and Adhesion Formation After Omentectomy with Ultrasonic Energy, Bipolar Sealing, and Suture Ligation

Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate the histopathological response and intra-abdominal adhesion formation after an omentectomy in rats using the bipolar vesselsealing device, ultrasonic coagulator, and suture ligation techniques. Forty Wistar albino rats were used, divided into four random groups. The rats underwent a midline laparotomy, and a partial omentectomy was performed using a 3-0 silk suture with suture ligation in group 1, bipolar device in group 2, and ultrasonic coagulator in group 3; only a laparo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of adhesion found reasons for an expectation of fewer adhesions, with a very significant difference in pathological adhesion scores favoring a previous version of the ultrasonic scalpel [13]. In a rat model, microscopic adhesion scores for an ultrasonic device were similar to the control, whereas macroscopic adhesion scores for ultrasonic were significantly lower than those for a bipolar device and for suture ligation [14]. More recent evaluations found fewer adhesions for a new ultrasonic device with intelligent control of energy delivery [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Models of adhesion found reasons for an expectation of fewer adhesions, with a very significant difference in pathological adhesion scores favoring a previous version of the ultrasonic scalpel [13]. In a rat model, microscopic adhesion scores for an ultrasonic device were similar to the control, whereas macroscopic adhesion scores for ultrasonic were significantly lower than those for a bipolar device and for suture ligation [14]. More recent evaluations found fewer adhesions for a new ultrasonic device with intelligent control of energy delivery [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%