2020
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological validation of magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of mixed-histological-type early gastric cancer

Abstract: BACKGROUND The undifferentiated-type (UDT) component profoundly affects the clinical course of early gastric cancers (EGCs). However, an accurate preoperative diagnosis of the histological types is unsatisfactory. To date, few studies have investigated whether the UDT component within mixed-histological-type (MT) EGCs can be recognized preoperatively. AIM To clarify the histopathological characteristics of the endoscopically-resected MT EGCs for investigating whether th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is meaningful to diagnose mixed type early gastric cancer before ESD procedures, which might reduce the incidence rates of additional surgery after ESD caused by incorrect pretreatment diagnosis of histological type. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging and biopsy was a promising measure for diagnosing mixed histologic type EGC [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is meaningful to diagnose mixed type early gastric cancer before ESD procedures, which might reduce the incidence rates of additional surgery after ESD caused by incorrect pretreatment diagnosis of histological type. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging and biopsy was a promising measure for diagnosing mixed histologic type EGC [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After scanning titles and abstracts, 47 citations remained for full-text assessment. The search results and selection process are summarized in Fig 1 . Twenty-three studies were excluded for the following reasons: 9 studies did not include histological mixed-type classification [16,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]; 6 did not directly mention the number of LNM cases [34][35][36][37][38][39]; 3 were considered to have unreliable data [40][41][42]; 2 were not confined to EGC [12,43]; and 3 were not accessible online. Finally, 24 studies were deemed eligible for the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%