2022
DOI: 10.51442/ijags.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Analogy and Political Continuity as Technologies of Power. The Armenian Genocide and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Interrelation in the Contemporary Armenian Politics

Abstract: Analyses of the transformation and political change in Armenia pays noticeable attention to the dominant role of discourses of the Armenian Genocide and the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh for nation and state-building processes. At the same time, the two issues usually are investigated separately. Attempts are rarely made to interpret the interrelation and connection between the two narratives. Nevertheless, the trauma-based discourse of memory is linking the two narratives as technology of power through discu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the political narrative, its ‘liberation’ from Armenian occupation was a liberation not so much from the Armenians, but rather from the decision of a Russian demigod standing behind the backs of decision-makers in Yerevan. In the case of Armenia, the sense of loss and sacrifice is linked to the relation between the memory of the Armenian genocide and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (Cheterian, 2018; Krzysztan, 2021a). Within this narrative, the memory of loss resulting from the genocide is combined with the territorial loss associated with the Soviet nationality policies of the 1920s and with the sacrifice and loss suffered as a result of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict against Azerbaijan.…”
Section: Victimhood and The Trauma Of The Lostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the political narrative, its ‘liberation’ from Armenian occupation was a liberation not so much from the Armenians, but rather from the decision of a Russian demigod standing behind the backs of decision-makers in Yerevan. In the case of Armenia, the sense of loss and sacrifice is linked to the relation between the memory of the Armenian genocide and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (Cheterian, 2018; Krzysztan, 2021a). Within this narrative, the memory of loss resulting from the genocide is combined with the territorial loss associated with the Soviet nationality policies of the 1920s and with the sacrifice and loss suffered as a result of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict against Azerbaijan.…”
Section: Victimhood and The Trauma Of The Lostmentioning
confidence: 99%