2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89668-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Archaeology of Gendered Lives

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A central claim of this article is that the bead assemblages recovered at Koromio and Makoroboi represent meaningful and intentional consumer choices, rather than simply forces of market access and economic standing. For the past thirty years, consumer choice and consumption models have helped archaeologists understand how the objects that people acquire both reflect and help to shape social self-creation-including not only class, but also gender and cultural identities (Cook et al 1996;Fitts 1999;Miller 1987;Rotman 2009;Spencer-Wood 1996;Wall 1991Wall , 1994. Spencer-Wood's (1987a: 1, 4, 10-11) Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology demonstrated how consumption patterns (particularly of ceramics and fauna) are shaped by socioeconomic status, market access, ethnicity, race, and political status, as well as household size, composition, and life cycle.…”
Section: Understanding Consumer Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central claim of this article is that the bead assemblages recovered at Koromio and Makoroboi represent meaningful and intentional consumer choices, rather than simply forces of market access and economic standing. For the past thirty years, consumer choice and consumption models have helped archaeologists understand how the objects that people acquire both reflect and help to shape social self-creation-including not only class, but also gender and cultural identities (Cook et al 1996;Fitts 1999;Miller 1987;Rotman 2009;Spencer-Wood 1996;Wall 1991Wall , 1994. Spencer-Wood's (1987a: 1, 4, 10-11) Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology demonstrated how consumption patterns (particularly of ceramics and fauna) are shaped by socioeconomic status, market access, ethnicity, race, and political status, as well as household size, composition, and life cycle.…”
Section: Understanding Consumer Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research themes and topics listed above follow investigative strategies recommended and discussed by several prominent historical archeologists, including: Barile (2004); Barile and Brandon (2004); Beaudry (1989Beaudry ( , 2002; Hardesty and Little (2000); Hendon (2006); LeeDecker (1994); Rotman (2009);Saitta (2007); Scott (1990); Spencer-Wood (1987,1999); Stine (1990);and Wilson (1990). Concepts pertaining to the historic farmsteads as agricultural systems and the importance of agricultural landscapes were derived from: Freeman et al (2005); Hardesty and Little (2000); Majewski and Gaimster (2009);McClelland et al (1989); Scott (1990); and Wilson (1990).…”
Section: Post-emancipation Transitions Of the Williams Family: Summarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a decrease in integrated household economies and the creation of a consumer economy aimed largely at the middle classes (Rotman 2009;Wall 1994). During this time period areas of homes and yards were redesigned to make them more isolated and private (Yentsch 1991, p. 196;Rotman 2009, p. 19;Wurst 2003).…”
Section: What Food Can Tell Us About Engagement With Gender Norms Andmentioning
confidence: 99%