2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical biogeography of the genusRhadinaea(Squamata: Dipsadinae)

Abstract: Multiple geological and climatic events have created geographical or ecological barriers associated with speciation events, playing a role in biological diversification in North and Central America. Here, we evaluate the influence of the Neogene and Quaternary geological events, as well as the climatic changes in the diversification of the colubrid snake genus Rhadinaea using molecular dating and ancestral area reconstruction. A multilocus sequence dataset was generated for 37 individuals of Rhadinaea from mos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(170 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservation status in Mexico according to the NOM-059-SEMARNAT (Semarnat, 2010): A = threatened, Pr = subject to special protection, Ne = Not evaluated); conservation status according to the Red List (IUCN, 2023): Dd = data deficient; LC = least concern, Vu = vulnerable, NT = near threatened; En = endangered; CR = critically endangered; Ne = not evaluated); population status according to IUCN (2023): environmental vulnerability score (EVS, low vulnerability species [L, 3-9], medium vulnerability species [M, 10-13], and high vulnerability species [H, 14-20] according to , , and Johnson et al [2017]). Townsend, 2007), Rhadinaea (García-Sotelo et al, 2021) or Lampropeltis (Burbrink et al, 2022). Also, in the case of lizards, in these regions the distribution of groups such as Xenosaurus (Nieto-Montes de Oca et al, 2017), Sceloporus (Leaché et al, 2016), Plestiodon and Scincella is presented in the same way (Brandley et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Conservation status in Mexico according to the NOM-059-SEMARNAT (Semarnat, 2010): A = threatened, Pr = subject to special protection, Ne = Not evaluated); conservation status according to the Red List (IUCN, 2023): Dd = data deficient; LC = least concern, Vu = vulnerable, NT = near threatened; En = endangered; CR = critically endangered; Ne = not evaluated); population status according to IUCN (2023): environmental vulnerability score (EVS, low vulnerability species [L, 3-9], medium vulnerability species [M, 10-13], and high vulnerability species [H, 14-20] according to , , and Johnson et al [2017]). Townsend, 2007), Rhadinaea (García-Sotelo et al, 2021) or Lampropeltis (Burbrink et al, 2022). Also, in the case of lizards, in these regions the distribution of groups such as Xenosaurus (Nieto-Montes de Oca et al, 2017), Sceloporus (Leaché et al, 2016), Plestiodon and Scincella is presented in the same way (Brandley et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6). Most of the analyzed papers (88.5%), however, have used the term to describe the study area or to use the MTZ or some of its provinces as areas of endemism for biogeographic analyses (e.g., García-Sotelo et al, 2021;Sánchez-Chávez et al, 2019;Schramm et al, 2021). Almost half of the papers (48.2%) use the conceptual background of the MTZ to explain or discuss the results, mainly as an explanation of the high diversity and endemicity because of the mixture of biotas and geological history (e.g., Anguiano-Constante et al, 2021;Ferrari et al, 2022;Ortiz-Brunel et al, 2021;Pérez-Hernández et al, 2022) or to refer to the role of the MTZ or some of its provinces as biogeographic barriers or routes of dispersal for plants or animals (Daza et al, 2009;Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al, 2022;Lamas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing the remaining cenocrons would help have a better understanding of their history and diversification in the MTZ. org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2023.94.5114 Almost as frequent as the cladistic biogeographic analyses were the studies classified in the so-called eventbased biogeography, based on ancestral geographic range reconstruction, where Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis (DIVA or S-DIVA) (Lamas et al, 2014;Pérez-Miranda et al, 2020), Dispersal-Extinction-Cladogenesis (DEC) (García-Sotelo et al, 2021;Gutiérrez-Ortega et al, 2018) and BioGeoBEARS (Mason et al, 2018;Sánchez-Chávez et al, 2019;Schramm et al, 2021) were used to evaluate biogeographic models explaining the historical biogeography of single groups. For example, García-Sotelo et al (2021) used the results of a phylogenetic analysis to evaluate the role of orogenic events on the diversification of Rhadinaea snakes.…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hypothesized causes of this diversity remain poorly tested, but interrelated biological, geological, and climatic factors are likely at play [5,6]. Many authors generally agree that complex historical processes of mountain formation, together with paleoclimatic events, created biogeographic barriers correlated with speciation in many Middle American vertebrates [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Today, striking and emblematic species of birds [14,15], snakes [16,17], frogs [18,19] and salamanders [20,21] live in these mountain woodlands and nowhere else.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%