Historical Consciousness and the Changing of German Political Culture

Lutz, Felix Philipp

doi:10.1080/714001307

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…consciousness, 61 discuss historical consciousness in educational contexts 62 or in specific political cultures and contexts, 63 analyze the psychological foundations 64 or the historical development 65 of historical consciousness and so on. Will this be an example of an interesting development that started at the periphery of the philosophy of history to later turn toward the core of the field, or will the debate remain relatively untranslated into English?…”

Section: Other Turns?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Philosophy of History After 1945: A Bibliometric Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much has been said about what philosophy of history should be. This bibliometric assessment of research in the philosophy of history examines what scholars in this field have actually produced. The study covers a dataset—a subsection of the bibliography of the International Network for Theory of History—of 13,953 books, articles, book chapters, dissertations, and other scholarly publications, encompassing materials written in seven different languages published between 1945 and 2014. This material was classified according to a multilayered system of taxonomy consisting of keywords representative of themes discussed in the field. Separate quantitative analyses were made to elucidate characteristics about the publication outputs in the field in the different language groups. Changes in paradigm, often referred to as “turns” or “trends,” have been mapped in this study, according to a quantitative analysis of the most recurrent keywords within a five‐year interval, which give an indication of the most debated themes in each period. ∗Religion/theology/secularization∗ is the most frequent keyword during the period 1945 to 1969, followed by ∗Marxism/historical‐materialism∗1 from 1970 to 1984, in what can be considered a second period of the field. Although many of the key publications of the linguistic turn were written within this second period, our dataset shows that it is not until the third period (1985–2014) that their writing goes on to influence other authors in the field.

show abstract

Section: Other Turns?mentioning

confidence: 99%