2019
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2019.1652937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical consciousness: the enigma of different paradigms

Abstract: To make historical consciousness beneficial for history education research we need to disentangle its multidisciplinary backgrounds so that contradictory approaches and outcomes can be avoided. The aim of this article therefore is to clarify the enigma of its different paradigms. We will discuss two interrelated paradigms: one interpreting historical consciousness as a collective phenomenon that is characteristic for modern Western society, and the other treating historical consciousness on an individual level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
15

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
35
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, using historical consciousness to characterise a specific achievement of modernity seems to be a project of less relevance. As Grever and Adriaansen (2019) point out, all cultures have ideas about the past, present and future. If we take this point further, cultures are in motion, open to influences and hybridising several, even contradictory, ideas.…”
Section: Theoretical Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, using historical consciousness to characterise a specific achievement of modernity seems to be a project of less relevance. As Grever and Adriaansen (2019) point out, all cultures have ideas about the past, present and future. If we take this point further, cultures are in motion, open to influences and hybridising several, even contradictory, ideas.…”
Section: Theoretical Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo que comparten es el tema de la conversación, que cada uno aborda desde sus propios horizontes de comprensión. Esto implica que los interlocutores al hablar reconocen las tradiciones de interpretación en las que se encuentran y no las utilizan como marcos de interpretación fijos (Grever & Adriaansen, 2019). Sin embargo, el problema es, precisamente, que los interlocutores en estos debates emocionales, por lo contrario, suelen considerar estos marcos como fijos.…”
Section: Historia Pública Y Cultura Histórica Popularunclassified
“…Jika seseorang menafsirkan budaya historis sebagai ekspresi kesadaran historis, ia mengasumsikan kesadaran historis ada di luar budaya historis yang memberinya makna esensialis dan historis (Grever & Adriaansen, 2019). budaya budaya historis sebagai konsep holistik yang menawarkan kemungkinan untuk menyelidiki berbagai cara di mana orang memberikan makna dari masa lalu (Grever & Adriaansen, 2017).…”
Section: Budaya Organisasiunclassified
“…budaya budaya historis sebagai konsep holistik yang menawarkan kemungkinan untuk menyelidiki berbagai cara di mana orang memberikan makna dari masa lalu (Grever & Adriaansen, 2017). Konsep ini mencakup tidak hanya isi spesifik ingatan kolektif dan imajinasi sejarah, tetapi juga cara di mana hubungan masa lalu dibangun dalam interaksi dinamis antara agensi manusia, tradisi, kinerja, representasi historis dan diseminasi mereka (Grever & Adriaansen, 2019).…”
Section: Budaya Organisasiunclassified