Interplay of Creativity and Giftedness in Science 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-163-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Contribution of Creativity to Development of Gifted Science Education in Formal and Informal Learning Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, creativity has been identified by many as an important indicator of giftedness (Plucker et al, 2018). In this respect, creativity is considered one of the main traits of giftedness, and gifted students are expected to produce creative learning products in the classroom (Bailey et al, 2016). As such, gifted students are considered to have higher-order cognitive abilities including creative abilities in the classroom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, creativity has been identified by many as an important indicator of giftedness (Plucker et al, 2018). In this respect, creativity is considered one of the main traits of giftedness, and gifted students are expected to produce creative learning products in the classroom (Bailey et al, 2016). As such, gifted students are considered to have higher-order cognitive abilities including creative abilities in the classroom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enjoyment and interest in science are often at the center of informal science design and have been found to influence attention, goals, and conceptual knowledge (Harlow, 2012;Hidi & Renninger, 2006). Furthermore, informal learning environments can also have a positive influence on interest and career choice, even after a single informal learning experience, by increasing student attitude toward science and making children more interested in potential STEM careers (Noel-Storr, Mitchell, & Drobnes, 2010;Bailey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%