The Handbook of Discourse Analysis 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118584194.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Discourse Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One can also study the specificity and meaning of selected variables in their cultural and historical context, but these are qualitative studies. The present study is an example of quantitative analysis (Baker, 2006;Chung & Pennebaker, 2007;Dalianis, 2018;Grimmer & Stewart, 2013;Mehl, 2006;Zurloni et al, 2006) and above all represents historical discourse analysis, which is quite commonly used in psychological research on discourse (Brinton, 2015;Landwehr, 2009;Laudoa & Vilanoub, 2015;Reisigl & Wodak, 2009). Psychological research on religious discourse is currently gaining more and more attention (Abdou, 2015;Baker & Vessey, 2018;Friedmann, 2008;Ingram, 2017;Stuckrad, 2015); this also applies to research on biblical texts (Ellens & Rollins, 2004;Kille, 2005;Theissen, 2007).…”
Section: Methods Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One can also study the specificity and meaning of selected variables in their cultural and historical context, but these are qualitative studies. The present study is an example of quantitative analysis (Baker, 2006;Chung & Pennebaker, 2007;Dalianis, 2018;Grimmer & Stewart, 2013;Mehl, 2006;Zurloni et al, 2006) and above all represents historical discourse analysis, which is quite commonly used in psychological research on discourse (Brinton, 2015;Landwehr, 2009;Laudoa & Vilanoub, 2015;Reisigl & Wodak, 2009). Psychological research on religious discourse is currently gaining more and more attention (Abdou, 2015;Baker & Vessey, 2018;Friedmann, 2008;Ingram, 2017;Stuckrad, 2015); this also applies to research on biblical texts (Ellens & Rollins, 2004;Kille, 2005;Theissen, 2007).…”
Section: Methods Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…El trabajo con fuentes escritas constituye, según Osterreicher (2004, p. 731), un reto general para el estudio diacrónico de cualquier lengua, pero no lo imposibilita. De hecho, en los documentos escritos también se encuentran evidencias 13 más o menos directas de las formas y variantes lingüísticas características de lo hablado. Si bien es cierto que no todos los documentos escritos antiguos presentan las mismas características, existen ciertos tipos de textos (Oesterreicher, 2004, p. 747) en los que se puede presumir un acercamiento a la lengua vernácula de tiempos pretéritos, como las cartas, los diarios o los documentos autobiográficos.…”
Section: La Historia De La Lengua Y Sus Fuentes Documentales De Estudiounclassified
“…1. Pragmática histórica: origen y repaso bibliográfico de los estudios en el mundo hispánico El origen de la pragmática histórica, disciplina cuyo objeto de estudio es el uso del lenguaje en contextos pasados (Taavitsainen y Fitzmaurice, 2007, p. 13), es relativamente reciente. Fue en 1985 cuando Stein acuñó el término pragmática histórica en su obra Perspectives on historical pragmatics.…”
unclassified
“…A field of diachronic discourse studies has been intensively developing in the last two decades (Brinton, 2001;Carroll, R., Hiltunen, R., Peikola, M., Skaffari, J.& et al,2003;Köhnen 2008;Jucker 2005). As Jucker (2005 p.9) points out it emerged on the linguistic landscape when historical linguists started to reach well beyond the sentence boundary and switched from studies of the language system to research of language-in-use that had occurred earlier in synchronic linguistics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%