2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10982-010-9082-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Entitlement and the Practice of Bequest: Is There a Moral Right of Bequest?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as a starting point we could take EdwardWolff's (2015: 244) calculation that an inheritance tax with a $500,000 (USD) exemption and top marginal rate of 45% would raise $31.6 billion. Although the money raised is not insubstantial, a more progressive structure is almost certainly required to meet important moral concerns.9For an argument detailing why the donor has no right to provide an unfettered bequest, see:Braun (2012; 2016).10Because bequest is being taxed, not banned, persons can still express solidarity with others through charitable bequests. In other words, a tax on bequest does not leave the promotion of solidarity entirely in the hands of the impersonal state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a starting point we could take EdwardWolff's (2015: 244) calculation that an inheritance tax with a $500,000 (USD) exemption and top marginal rate of 45% would raise $31.6 billion. Although the money raised is not insubstantial, a more progressive structure is almost certainly required to meet important moral concerns.9For an argument detailing why the donor has no right to provide an unfettered bequest, see:Braun (2012; 2016).10Because bequest is being taxed, not banned, persons can still express solidarity with others through charitable bequests. In other words, a tax on bequest does not leave the promotion of solidarity entirely in the hands of the impersonal state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%