2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2022.101481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical gender discrimination does not explain comparative Western European development: evidence from Portugal, 1300-1900

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the gender wage ratio in Japan was high and stable at around 0.7. Unlike most past studies (with the exception of (Palma et al, 2021)) , our detailed data allows us to show that measuring gender wage ratios within employers does not change this result. We next examine the available evidence on why a gender wage gap existed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We find that the gender wage ratio in Japan was high and stable at around 0.7. Unlike most past studies (with the exception of (Palma et al, 2021)) , our detailed data allows us to show that measuring gender wage ratios within employers does not change this result. We next examine the available evidence on why a gender wage gap existed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In comparison, the estimates from Southwest Europe are much lower at around 0.5 although recent work on Portugal suggests it may have had similarly high gender wage ratios (Palma et al, 2021). The Japanese gender wage ratio is comparable to English laborers on annual contracts but higher than those on day contracts.…”
Section: Female Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations