2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818311000002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Institutionalism in International Relations

Abstract: This article reviews recent contributions to International Relations (IR) that engage the substantive concerns of historical institutionalism and explicitly and implicitly employ that tradition's analytical features to address fundamental questions in the study of international affairs. It explores the promise of this tradition for new research agendas in the study of international political development, including the origin of state preferences, the nature of governance gaps, and the nature of change and cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
147
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
147
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research tends to emphasize the reasons why IOs are resistant to change, citing demanding decision hurdles (Scharpf 1988), stabilizing organizational cultures (Barnett and Finnemore 2004), and feedback effects that lock in the status quo (Fioretos 2011). Our results suggest a more complex picture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Existing research tends to emphasize the reasons why IOs are resistant to change, citing demanding decision hurdles (Scharpf 1988), stabilizing organizational cultures (Barnett and Finnemore 2004), and feedback effects that lock in the status quo (Fioretos 2011). Our results suggest a more complex picture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Finally, my results have implications for the literature on institutional development in global governance (Fioretos 2011;Lipscy 2015). While both historical and rational choice institutionalism tend to highlight the reasons for IOs' resistance to change (Hawkins et al 2006;Koremenos et al 2001), more recent studies have shown that firm legitimacy pressures drive IOs to adapt their institutional designs to normative demands (Zürn 2018;Lenz and Viola 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Path dependency is a key concept in historical institutionalism, a theoretical tradition that has been predominantly applied in the study of comparative politics, but that also has found increasing application in the study of European integration and international relations (Fioretos 2011). Historical institutionalism, with its emphasis on the structuring power of institutions and its expectation of continuity, also contains statements of a normative character.…”
Section: Path Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%