Historical Origins of the Tuskegee Experiment: The Dilemma of Public Health in the United States

Abstract

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male was an observational study on African-American males in Tuskegee, Alabama between 1932 and 1972. The U. S. Public Health Service ran this study on more than 300 people without notifying the participants about their disease nor treating them even after the introduction of penicillin. The study included recording the progress of disease and performing an autopsy on the deaths. This paper explores historical backgrounds enabled this infamous study, and discusses three driving forces behind the Tuskegee Study. First, it is important to understand that the Public Health Service was established in the U. S. Surgeon General's office and was operated as a military organization. Amidst the development of an imperial agenda of the U.S. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the PHS was responsible for protecting hygiene and the superiority of "the American race" against infectious foreign elements from the borders. The U.S. Army's experience of medical experiments in colonies and abroad was imported back to the country and formed a crucial part of the attitude and philosophy on public health. Secondly, the growing influence of eugenics and racial pathology at the time reinforced discriminative views on minorities. Progressivism was realized in the form of domestic reform and imperial pursuit at the same time. Major medical journals argued that blacks were inclined to have certain defects, especially sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, because of their prodigal behavior and lack of hygiene. This kind of racial ideas were shared by the PHS officials who were in charge of the Tuskegee Study. Lastly, the PHS officials believed in continuing the experiment regardless of various social changes. They considered that black participants were not only poor but also ignorant of and even unwilling to undergo the treatment. When the exposure of the experiment led to the Senate investigation in 1973, the participating doctors of the PHS maintained that their study offered valuable contribution to the medical research. This paper argues that the combination of the efficiency of military medicine, progressive and imperial racial ideology, and discrimination on African-Americans resulted in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.

Social determinants of flu vaccine uptake among racial/ethnic minorities in the United States

“…This study examines the association of flu vaccination uptake and demographic measures within major US racial/ethnic groups to identify low vaccine uptake subgroups within each racial/ethnic group. Vaccine hesitancy is often high within minoritized communities due to historical problems with access to the medical system, distrust due to historic inequities and the history of racist medical trials like Tuskeegee ( Feagin and Bennefield, 2014 , Gamble, 1997 , Park, 2017 ). Though, in aggregate, individuals in minoritized and marginalized communities face greater structural inequalities, these inequalities are not necessarily evenly distributed within a community.…”

Community Engagement Practices at Research Centers in U.S. Minority Institutions: Priority Populations and Innovative Approaches to Advancing Health Disparities Research

“…Community members and leaders have less familiarity with research processes and requirements related to institutional review boards and research designs. Moreover, research mistrust due to personal negative experiences and/or the national and global residue associated with the historical mistreatment of minority populations by researchers are understandably still pervasive [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. These trends are being slowly reversed in academic institutions whose CECs are integrated as institutional resources, rather than siloed in discrete research projects.…”

How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study

“…Our analysis revealed that [Inappropriate research] can result not only from researcher-centered research that prioritizes the interests of researchers, but also from other factors such as a lack of research knowledge or a mismatch in professional values. To avoid engaging in inappropriate research practices, community pharmacists must master the ability to cope with ethical issues based on an understanding of the laws and standards pertaining to research ethics [1,2] and an awareness of past examples of research malpractice [17,18]. In a concept analysis of medical professionals' ethical sensitivity, Aoyagi identified three abilities that such professionals require in medical practice: the ability to detect ethical issues, the ability to clarify them, and the ability to deal with them [19].…”