Historical Trends in the Pragmatics of Indirect Reports in Dutch Crime News Stories

Abstract

Recent research has shown that the use of indirect reports in Dutch crime news stories has decreased significantly over the past 150 years. In this study we explore possible explanations for this decrease by assessing variations in the degree of intertwinement between the voices of journalist and news source in a corpus of 528 indirect reports. Results indicate that in indirect reports from the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the journalist's voice was typically either dominant over or strongly intertwined with the news source's voice. In later periods, the voices of journalist and news source seem to have become disentangled. The decrease in indirect reports in Dutch news stories might thus be explained by an increased avoidance of the subjective intertwining of voices and, correspondingly, an increased separation of responsibilities between journalist and news sources. In this sense, the pragmatics of indirect reports became similar to the pragmatics of direct reports, causing the grammatically embedding indirect mode to lose its distinctive function. KeywordsDutch journalism • crime news stories • voice intertwinement • historical analysis K. van Krieken ( ) • J. Sanders

Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework

“…Direct thoughts such as (3c) represent a character’s psychological viewpoint most explicitly since they verbalize thoughts verbatim. Indirect (3c’) thoughts, by contrast, do not depict thoughts in a literal way but paraphrase to larger or lesser extent the inner voice of the character ( Van Krieken and Sanders, forthcoming ), while thoughts represented in the free indirect mode lead to the inner voice of the character becoming intertwined with the narrator’s voice ( Sanders and Redeker, 1996 ; Semino and Short, 2004 ).…”

Do Reconstructive and Attributive Quotes in News Narratives Influence Engagement, Credibility and Realism?

“…Quotes are essential aspects of news stories (Zelizer 1995;Nylund 2003). Much research on quotation in journalism is concerned with linguistic and functional differences between direct quotes, in which a news source's speech is rendered verbatim, and indirect quotes, in which a news source's speech is paraphrased (Waugh 1995;Semino, Short, and Culpeper 1997;Vis, Sanders, and Spooren 2015;Van Krieken and Sanders 2018). In line with research on quotation in non-narrative discourse genres, a general assumption is that direct quotes increase both the liveliness and faithfulness of stories to a greater extent than indirect quotes (Clark and Gerrig 1990;Thompson 1996;Short, Semino, and Wynne 2002).…”