2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2015.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical tsunami and storm deposits during the last five centuries on the Sanriku coast, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study estimated each event age using 137 Cs, excess 210 Pb, and radiocarbon dating. Although Goto et al (2015) identified more events since fifteenth centuries compared to this study, they indicated the occurrence of the 1933, 1896, and 1611 historical tsunami deposits identified in Koyadori. However, there were too many washover deposits in Goto's site, and thus it is considered that they could not distinguish between the tsunami and storm deposits clearly.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating and The Modeled Ages Of Tsunami Depositscontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study estimated each event age using 137 Cs, excess 210 Pb, and radiocarbon dating. Although Goto et al (2015) identified more events since fifteenth centuries compared to this study, they indicated the occurrence of the 1933, 1896, and 1611 historical tsunami deposits identified in Koyadori. However, there were too many washover deposits in Goto's site, and thus it is considered that they could not distinguish between the tsunami and storm deposits clearly.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating and The Modeled Ages Of Tsunami Depositscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, Goto et al (2015) conducted a paleo-tsunami survey in Miyako, 50 km north from Koyadori, and discovered nine washover deposits interpreted as tsunami and storm deposits since 15 centuries. The study estimated each event age using 137 Cs, excess 210 Pb, and radiocarbon dating.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating and The Modeled Ages Of Tsunami Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research of tsunami deposits has been intensively conducted on and off the Pacific coast in the Tohoku region since the 2011 Tohoku‐oki earthquake (Goto et al ., ; Ishimura and Miyauchi, ; Ikehara et al ., ; Takada et al ., ; Inoue et al ., ; Usami et al ., ), however, in correlating tsunami deposits between terrestrial and marine sediments, the reservoir effect is a critical uncertainty. Therefore, To‐Cu may provide a robust isochronous surface and age marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we measured more than 30 volcanic glass shards using a refractive index measuring system (RIMS 2000: Kyoto Fission Track Co., Ltd). The RIMS system measures the refractive indices of volcanic glass shards with an accuracy of ±0.0002 (Danhara et al, 1992).…”
Section: Tephra Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunami deposits are generated as a consequence of onshore inundation and backwash flow of large water bodies and exhibit many distinct characteristics, ranging from variations in the mineral composition and distribution to particle size range [Atwater and Moore, 1992;Dawson and Shi, 2000;Moore et al, 2006;Morton et al, 2007;Richmond et al, 2011;Ram ırez-Herrera et al, 2007, 2012Goto et al, 2015]. During the last decade, several multidisciplinary studies have been carried out to identify and characterize extreme inundation deposits [e.g., Kortekaas and Dawson, 2007;Ram ırez-Herrera et al, 2007, 2012Font et al, 2010Font et al, , 2013Engel and Br€ uckner, 2011;Wassmer and Gomez, 2011;Shanmugam, 2012;Cuven et al, 2013;Goto et al, 2014Goto et al, , 2015. Since 2010, magnetic parameters such as magnetic susceptibility and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) have proved highly resolving in tsunami deposit research [Font et al, 2010;Wassmer et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%