Perspectives on Public Relations Historiography and Historical Theorization 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137404381_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historiography (and Theory) of Public Relations History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many historical analyses proceed via chronological organization; however, my analysis has more in common with non-linear approaches that embrace a variety of complexities often involved in historical interpretation (Holtzhausen, 2012; Lamme and Russell, 2010; Wehmeier, 2015). Thus, in this article, archival materials are not always presented in the order in which the events happened.…”
Section: Historical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many historical analyses proceed via chronological organization; however, my analysis has more in common with non-linear approaches that embrace a variety of complexities often involved in historical interpretation (Holtzhausen, 2012; Lamme and Russell, 2010; Wehmeier, 2015). Thus, in this article, archival materials are not always presented in the order in which the events happened.…”
Section: Historical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coverage chronicled the railroad expansion debate, railroad celebrations, and corporate responsibility. While this data set of archival materials provides a productive rendering of the rise of the railroad in Virginia and the public relations efforts that supported its emergence, my analysis is necessarily limited by the typical challenges associated with archival work, such as incomplete or missing documents, multiple interpretations of historical events, and the inherent ambiguity of the meanings ascribed to both historical documents and events (Holtzhausen, 2012; L’Etang, 2008; Wehmeier, 2015). A brief overview of railroad development in Virginia and the battle for westward expansion will provide useful historical context for the analysis that follows.…”
Section: Historical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PR field was long dominated by an American-centred progressivism linked to a functional model, and celebration of a few key figures (nearly all men) largely presented as heroes in an emergent mythology that often privileged the views of the longest-living. Nevertheless, critical, revisionist histories have emerged as have recent critical historiographies (see, for example, Bentele, 2015; Lamme, 2015; L’Etang, 2015; Wehmeier, 2015; all in Watson, 2015), alongside diverse cultural and national histories, some inflected with power and gender perspectives. In particular, feminist scholars have sought to incorporate better historical understanding of PR in part to address the emphasis on male histories (Brown, 2014).…”
Section: Public Relations History and Historiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. Wehmeier’s (2015) voice is present in the series in the volume on historiography, in which he reviews theories underpinning, positivist, postmodern and poststructuralist historiographies putting ongoing debates within public relations into a broader perspective that re-considers time and epochs. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%