Historiography of Mathematics from the Mathematician’s Point of View

Abstract

Mathematicians used to be highly invested in the study of the history of their own field, but their voice in historiographical discussions has diminished in influence in the past century. One prominent narrative paints this as a justified fall from grace: mathematicians wedded to present mathematical values looked at the past with prejudiced eyes, whereas a new generation of historians were better able to appreciate the past proper, in its own terms. But the best internalist mathematical historiography of old needed no such external corrective. It was already committed to avoiding presentism and anachronism, for reasons that were not in opposition to mathematical values but rather derived directly from a positive vision of the role that history could play in the mathematical community. In this vision, a historical understanding of how a field developed is a proxy for first-hand research experience in that field. It follows that it is essential for historical accounts to thoroughly convey the scope and limitations of alternative conceptions and approaches, including dead-end developments, since this is precisely what sets the critical knowledge gained by first-hand research experience apart from the doctrinal knowledge gained merely from a textbook. Hence, from this point of view, presentist historiography is not the natural outlook of the mathematician, but rather a direct antithesis of the mathematician's most fundamental V. Blåsjö (*)