2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-013-9175-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and physical examination of the hip: the basics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different clinicians apply and interpret clinical tests differently, with little consistency between professional groups or among peers 45 46. Even when tests are well defined, they have often been evaluated in populations with a high likelihood of a positive test,18 so their performance in a different environment (such as primary care) is not known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different clinicians apply and interpret clinical tests differently, with little consistency between professional groups or among peers 45 46. Even when tests are well defined, they have often been evaluated in populations with a high likelihood of a positive test,18 so their performance in a different environment (such as primary care) is not known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical presentation was fundamentally comparable to the contralateral, with medial "bulging" presence during the Valsalva maneuver, and moderate impulse along the funiculus as the finger was leaving the canal (M1 + L1 as in the European Hernia Society classification) 45 . The left hip appeared limited in flexion, with positive FABER and FADDIR test 46 , resulting in a 6/10 algic symptomatology on the VAS scale 47 . Isometric contraction of adductor muscles with proximal and distal resistance caused a bilateral 7/10 and 9/10 VAS scale value, respectively to quadrant 1 and 2 in Figure 3.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young patients especially may not be able to differentiate among groin pain, lateral hip pain, or low back pain, and often it is up to the clinician to tease out the Downloaded by [New York University] at 20:39 31 July 2015 pertinent anatomical and historical details that may help guide the differential diagnosis. 9,12,20 Given the proximity of the hip joint to other important anatomical structures, including the lumbosacral spine, reproductive organs, and gastrointestinal tract, referred or radiating pain must be distinguished from primary intra-articular hip pain. Any unexpected symptoms, including the atraumatic, insidious onset of pain associated with weight loss, fevers, night pain, or malaise, must be evaluated in further detail to rule out potential inflammatory, infectious, or malignant etiologies.…”
Section: History and Patient Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12]25 The order in which the examination steps are performed can vary, and is often dictated by the patient's complaints. For example, in the patient described above with lateral hip pain, the examiner may wish to examine the trochanteric bursa last, so as not to cause pain at the beginning of the examination and lead the patient to guard for the remainder of the examination.…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation