2015
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2015011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and sensitivity comparison of two standard whole-sediment toxicity tests with crustaceans: the amphipodHyalella aztecaand the ostracodHeterocypris incongruensmicrobiotest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2021), crustacean-based bioassays (Thamnocephalus platyurus, H. incongruens) were more sensitive to the presence of high arsenic contents in soils than the Microtox microbial test. The higher sensitivity of H. incongruens was probably due to direct contact of the medium with the test organism, as the main route of exposure of H. incongruens is the oral route (Oleszczuk 2008;Cooman et al 2015;Szara et al 2020). On the other hand, the reason for reduced plant sensitivity in the Phytotoxkit assay may be the separation of plant roots from the test soil with filter paper, which is performed according to the test procedure (Van der Vliet et al Effect: no toxic (PE < 20%), low toxic (20% ≤ PE < 50%), toxic (50% ≤ PE < 100%), and very toxic (PE = 100%) 2012).…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2021), crustacean-based bioassays (Thamnocephalus platyurus, H. incongruens) were more sensitive to the presence of high arsenic contents in soils than the Microtox microbial test. The higher sensitivity of H. incongruens was probably due to direct contact of the medium with the test organism, as the main route of exposure of H. incongruens is the oral route (Oleszczuk 2008;Cooman et al 2015;Szara et al 2020). On the other hand, the reason for reduced plant sensitivity in the Phytotoxkit assay may be the separation of plant roots from the test soil with filter paper, which is performed according to the test procedure (Van der Vliet et al Effect: no toxic (PE < 20%), low toxic (20% ≤ PE < 50%), toxic (50% ≤ PE < 100%), and very toxic (PE = 100%) 2012).…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of changes in luminescence was performed using a Microtox M500 Analyzer (Microbics Corporation, 1992 ). The mortality and growth inhibition of the Heterocypris incongruens crustacean after a 6-day contact with the sediment was measured with the use of the Ostracodtoxkit biotest (Ostracodtoxkit, 2001 ; Cooman et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current data, sediment chemical analyses should be complemented by ecotoxicological studies, as the large number of potentially toxic compounds in sediments makes chemical assessment time-consuming, costly and often impossible. In addition, neither bioavailability nor interaction between substances can be investigated by chemical methods (Wadhia & Thompson, 2007 ; Baran & Tarnawski, 2015 ; Cooman et al, 2015 ; Hise et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 Many campaigns entail tests with Heterocypris incongruens (seed shrimp). 41 − 44 H. incongruens is substantially more sensitive than midge larvae 45 and comparably sensitive (to heavy metals, NH 4 + ) with H. azteca , 41 but H. incongruens growth is particularly sensitive. 39 As Flanders is an urbanized coastal (maritime) and agricultural region, concentrations of organotins (antifouling endocrine disruptors) 46 48 and phosphate 49 , 50 could be elevated and particularly relevant for growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%