2018
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1543661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History in corporate social responsibility: Reviewing and setting an agenda

Abstract: This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Going farther back in time, Hielscher and Husted (2019) examine the "proto-CSR" activities of mining guilds as far back as the thirteenth century. This extends, as well, to the more recent (2017), Marens (2010Marens ( , 2012Marens ( , 2013, Stutz (2018) Hielscher and Husted (2019) Past-in-CSR Examines the past to challenge and substantiate CSR theories and practical prescriptions through a history-sensitive lens Add historical context and complexity to CSR theorizing in response to concerns of theoretical formalism and ahistoricism What are the taken-for-granted assumptions in present CSR theorizing? How can historical research problematize present CSR discourse?…”
Section: Past-of-csr: History Of Csr Thought and Practicementioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Going farther back in time, Hielscher and Husted (2019) examine the "proto-CSR" activities of mining guilds as far back as the thirteenth century. This extends, as well, to the more recent (2017), Marens (2010Marens ( , 2012Marens ( , 2013, Stutz (2018) Hielscher and Husted (2019) Past-in-CSR Examines the past to challenge and substantiate CSR theories and practical prescriptions through a history-sensitive lens Add historical context and complexity to CSR theorizing in response to concerns of theoretical formalism and ahistoricism What are the taken-for-granted assumptions in present CSR theorizing? How can historical research problematize present CSR discourse?…”
Section: Past-of-csr: History Of Csr Thought and Practicementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Booth et al (2007), , Mena et al (2016), Stutz and Schrempf-Stirling (2019) Van Lent and Smith (2019) Coraiola and Derry (2019) global diffusion (e.g., Kaplan and Kinderman 2017) of ethical thinking and practice in business (e.g., Antal et al 2009;Bengtsson 2008;Ihlen and von Weltzien Hoivik 2013;Van Buren 2008). However, Stutz (2018) presents the history of CSR thought and practice from three distinct meta-theoretical orientations towards CSR (viz., economic, critical, and politico-ethical lens). This contrast of distinct narrative accounts demonstrates how the mobilization of history also serves political purposes in the present (De Baets 2009).…”
Section: Past-of-csr: History Of Csr Thought and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CSR looks at this from the viewpoint of companies, SRI from the viewpoint of investors in those companies" (p. 42). See also Marinetto (1999) and Stutz (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%