1992
DOI: 10.1080/07060669209500904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History, occurrence, impact, and control of blackleg of rapeseed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Canada, L. maculans was first identified in Saskatchewan in 1975 (McGee andPetrie 1978), and later in Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia (Gugel and Petrie 1992). Prior to the 1970s, only L. biglobosa was identified in Canada and blackleg was not a major concern in rapeseed production.…”
Section: Blackleg Disease In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Canada, L. maculans was first identified in Saskatchewan in 1975 (McGee andPetrie 1978), and later in Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia (Gugel and Petrie 1992). Prior to the 1970s, only L. biglobosa was identified in Canada and blackleg was not a major concern in rapeseed production.…”
Section: Blackleg Disease In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies largely contributed to the reduced disease incidence and disease severity. For example, in the early 1990s, provincial canola yield losses from blackleg declined to 1% in Alberta (Gugel and Petrie 1992).…”
Section: Fighting Against Blackleg Disease In the Early 1990smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…& de Not is a devastating disease of canola (Brassica napus L. and B. rapa L.) and has caused extensive yield losses in Europe, Australia, and Canada (Gugel and Petrie 1992). Since chemical control of the disease is difficult, is uneconomical, and poses risks to the producer and the environment (Ahlers 1991), the introduction of genetic resistance to blackleg has become a major objective of canola breeding programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous work (3) indicated that some of the compounds isolated from cultures of P. lingam were also present in cultures of P. wasabiae. Now it is clear that the profile of metabolites common to P. wasabiae and P. lingam is much broader; not only phomaligols (1, 2) and phomaligadiones (5,6) are present in liquid cultures of both species, but also wasabidienones Bo (16) and B, (17) (12) were present in similar liquid cultures.…”
Section: Ch3mentioning
confidence: 99%