1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19960410)66:2<170::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of childbearing and colorectal cancer risk in women aged less than 60: An analysis of Swedish routine registry data 1960–1984

Abstract: Data from a computerised linkage between the Swedish Cancer Registry and the Fertility Registry were used to study the influence of reproductive history on the risk of colorectal cancer in women aged less than 60, in the period 1960 to 1984. A "nested" case-control design was used with 1,415 colon cancer cases and 733 rectal cancer cases, and 7,073 and 3,665 age-matched controls, respectively. Conditional logistic regression was employed to study the independent effects of parity, age at first birth and years … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have found an inverse association of old age at first birth, 28 while others have observed a decreased risk of colorectal cancer with earlier age at first birth. 29 Older age at first birth might be generally related with lower parity and vice versa, which was verified in the present study (data not shown). the dissimilar reproductive patterns of adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon and rectum in the present study indicate that the association of sex hormones with colorectal adenocarcinoma might be confounded by lifestyle factors differently for colorectal cancer in different anatomical locations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some have found an inverse association of old age at first birth, 28 while others have observed a decreased risk of colorectal cancer with earlier age at first birth. 29 Older age at first birth might be generally related with lower parity and vice versa, which was verified in the present study (data not shown). the dissimilar reproductive patterns of adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon and rectum in the present study indicate that the association of sex hormones with colorectal adenocarcinoma might be confounded by lifestyle factors differently for colorectal cancer in different anatomical locations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…although many previous case-control 9,10,14,15,23,24,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] or cohort studies 1,2,[11][12][13]16,17,20,23,25,44,45 examined the relation of reproductive factors and risk of colorectal cancer, most did not find associations. to the extent that pregnancy might have long-lasting effects on the hormonal milieu, it is possible that resulting changes in appetite, taste, or physical activities could contribute to the development of colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have shown a positive relationship between the number of deliveries and the overall risk of gastric cancer morbidity, 25 26 although Palli et al 27 could not confirm that. A protective effect of multiparity on colon cancer morbidity has been seen in some studies, 28 although some other studies have failed to find any association between parity and mortality from colorectal cancer. 29 In this study, the risk of accidental death was over twofold among the primiparous women compared with those of the reference group, and there was a clear tendency towards decreasing suicide rates with an increasing number of children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…38 A larger number of case/control studies more uniformly reported a risk reduction of colorectal cancer in multiparous women. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] It is likely that the concentration of protective sugars produced during the breastfeeding period is high in the milkproducing breasts, but decreases with increasing physical distance from the producing organ. This may explain a somewhat lower rate of colon cancer reduction after multiple breastfeeding periods in comparison to breast cancer.…”
Section: Colon Cancer Risk Of Multiparous Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%