2020
DOI: 10.30965/23642807-00602006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of Inter-Religious Dialogue in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract: Bosnia and Herzegovina has always been a multi-religious polity. While inter-religious relations were not always easy, the heterogeneity seems to be inherent to Bosnia. Significant resources were invested in the 1990s to alter that reality. The damage has been done but efforts have been made by various local and international actors to repair it. This article offers a brief account of the history of formal inter-religious dialogue in Bosnia, its main actors, and features. Major issues, types of dialogue, accom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new, post-1990 era was marked by attempts to address ethno-religious divisions by engineering the ‘areligious’ nation of Yugoslavs and ‘atheization’ of its citizens. This policy however proved to be unsuccessful, as according to the 1991 census, only 6% of its population were identified as Yugoslavs, whereas more than 90% were identified with one of the three major ethno-religious groups (Alibašić, 2017; 21). In political terms, the most significant outcome was that communism failed to give way to a western-style democracy but rather to an ethno-religious one.…”
Section: The Vicious Circle Of the Governance Of Religious Diversity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new, post-1990 era was marked by attempts to address ethno-religious divisions by engineering the ‘areligious’ nation of Yugoslavs and ‘atheization’ of its citizens. This policy however proved to be unsuccessful, as according to the 1991 census, only 6% of its population were identified as Yugoslavs, whereas more than 90% were identified with one of the three major ethno-religious groups (Alibašić, 2017; 21). In political terms, the most significant outcome was that communism failed to give way to a western-style democracy but rather to an ethno-religious one.…”
Section: The Vicious Circle Of the Governance Of Religious Diversity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%