Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
В статье рассматривается роль церкви в формировании репродуктивного поведения в древнерусской семье. Историографический анализ проблемы показывает, что до настоящего времени она не получила окончательного разрешения ни в отечественной, ни в зарубежной литературе. Христианство играло значительную роль в поддержании значимости деторождения в древнерусском обществе, провозглашая появление потомства главной целью брака. Эта позиция церкви была близка мирянам, для которых рождение наследника означало возможность передать ему нажитое имущество, социальный статус, власть, обеспечить поминовение души. В средневековом обществе ответственность за отсутствие детей возлагалась на женщину. Бездетность для нее чаще всего означала пострижение в монастырь, иногда насильственное. Принятие бесплодной женой пострига было единственной возможностью для мужчины расторгнуть бездетный союз и получить надежду на отцовство в новом браке. Учитывая важность продления рода, супруги старались любыми способами получить долгожданное потомство. Для решения проблемы чадородия они обращались за помощью не только к христианской церкви, но и к языческим обрядам, вызывая недовольство церкви, выступавшей против любых проявлений язычества. С точки зрения христианства, рождение ребенка – это дар Божий, следовательно, получить его можно только с помощью веры и молитвы. Священники вели ожесточенную борьбу против любых способов недопущения беременности, ее прерывания. Строго наказывались мужья, действия которых создавали угрозу прерывания беременности у их жен. Еще более решительные действия предпринимала церковь в борьбе с убийством новорожденных. Она постоянно ужесточала ответственность матери за это преступление: от строгой епитимии до смертной казни. Автор приходит к выводу, что в древнерусском обществе церковь взяла на себя функцию формирования репродуктивного поведения. Она сводилась, с одной стороны, к поощрению многодетности, борьбе с различными действиями, направленными на предотвращение беременности или избавление от ребенка, а с другой – к противодействию любым пережиткам язычества, даже если они использовались для преодоления проблемы бесплодия. The article examines the role of the church in the formation of reproductive behavior in the Old Russian family. The historiographical analysis of the problem shows that it has not been solved in either domestic or foreign literature. Christianity played a significant role in maintaining the importance of childbearing in ancient Russian society, proclaiming the appearance of offspring as the main purpose of marriage. This position of the church was close to the laity, for whom the birth of an heir meant the opportunity to pass down the acquired property, social status and power to children, to ensure prayer for the dead. In medieval society, the responsibility for the absence of children was assigned to a woman. Her childlessness was often followed by taking the monastic veil, sometimes forcibly. Taking the veil by his wife was the only opportunity for a man to terminate a childless marriage and get a chance of hope for fatherhood in a new marriage. Given the importance of procreation, married couples tried to have the long-awaited offspring by any means. To solve the problem of childbearing, they turned for help not only to the Christian church but also to pagan rituals, thus causing discontent of the church, which opposed the manifestations of paganism in matters of conception. From the Christian point of view, the birth of a child is a gift from God, and therefore it can be obtained only with the help of faith and prayer. The priests waged a fierce struggle against any means of preventing pregnancy and its termination. The husbands whose actions threatened to terminate their wives’ pregnancies were severely punished. Even more decisive actions were taken by the church in the fight against the murder of newborns. It constantly tightened the mother’s responsibility for this crime, from strict penance to the death penalty. The author comes to the conclusion that in ancient Russian society the church assumed the function of forming reproductive behavior. It was reduced, on the one hand, to encouraging large families with many children and combating any actions aimed at preventing pregnancy or getting rid of a child and, on the other hand, to countering any vestiges of paganism, even if they were used to overcome the problem of infertility.
В статье рассматривается роль церкви в формировании репродуктивного поведения в древнерусской семье. Историографический анализ проблемы показывает, что до настоящего времени она не получила окончательного разрешения ни в отечественной, ни в зарубежной литературе. Христианство играло значительную роль в поддержании значимости деторождения в древнерусском обществе, провозглашая появление потомства главной целью брака. Эта позиция церкви была близка мирянам, для которых рождение наследника означало возможность передать ему нажитое имущество, социальный статус, власть, обеспечить поминовение души. В средневековом обществе ответственность за отсутствие детей возлагалась на женщину. Бездетность для нее чаще всего означала пострижение в монастырь, иногда насильственное. Принятие бесплодной женой пострига было единственной возможностью для мужчины расторгнуть бездетный союз и получить надежду на отцовство в новом браке. Учитывая важность продления рода, супруги старались любыми способами получить долгожданное потомство. Для решения проблемы чадородия они обращались за помощью не только к христианской церкви, но и к языческим обрядам, вызывая недовольство церкви, выступавшей против любых проявлений язычества. С точки зрения христианства, рождение ребенка – это дар Божий, следовательно, получить его можно только с помощью веры и молитвы. Священники вели ожесточенную борьбу против любых способов недопущения беременности, ее прерывания. Строго наказывались мужья, действия которых создавали угрозу прерывания беременности у их жен. Еще более решительные действия предпринимала церковь в борьбе с убийством новорожденных. Она постоянно ужесточала ответственность матери за это преступление: от строгой епитимии до смертной казни. Автор приходит к выводу, что в древнерусском обществе церковь взяла на себя функцию формирования репродуктивного поведения. Она сводилась, с одной стороны, к поощрению многодетности, борьбе с различными действиями, направленными на предотвращение беременности или избавление от ребенка, а с другой – к противодействию любым пережиткам язычества, даже если они использовались для преодоления проблемы бесплодия. The article examines the role of the church in the formation of reproductive behavior in the Old Russian family. The historiographical analysis of the problem shows that it has not been solved in either domestic or foreign literature. Christianity played a significant role in maintaining the importance of childbearing in ancient Russian society, proclaiming the appearance of offspring as the main purpose of marriage. This position of the church was close to the laity, for whom the birth of an heir meant the opportunity to pass down the acquired property, social status and power to children, to ensure prayer for the dead. In medieval society, the responsibility for the absence of children was assigned to a woman. Her childlessness was often followed by taking the monastic veil, sometimes forcibly. Taking the veil by his wife was the only opportunity for a man to terminate a childless marriage and get a chance of hope for fatherhood in a new marriage. Given the importance of procreation, married couples tried to have the long-awaited offspring by any means. To solve the problem of childbearing, they turned for help not only to the Christian church but also to pagan rituals, thus causing discontent of the church, which opposed the manifestations of paganism in matters of conception. From the Christian point of view, the birth of a child is a gift from God, and therefore it can be obtained only with the help of faith and prayer. The priests waged a fierce struggle against any means of preventing pregnancy and its termination. The husbands whose actions threatened to terminate their wives’ pregnancies were severely punished. Even more decisive actions were taken by the church in the fight against the murder of newborns. It constantly tightened the mother’s responsibility for this crime, from strict penance to the death penalty. The author comes to the conclusion that in ancient Russian society the church assumed the function of forming reproductive behavior. It was reduced, on the one hand, to encouraging large families with many children and combating any actions aimed at preventing pregnancy or getting rid of a child and, on the other hand, to countering any vestiges of paganism, even if they were used to overcome the problem of infertility.
The article presents an overview of the reports of participants of scientific conferences held at the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and dedicated to its 25th anniversary, which were devoted to the formation, development and current state of legal science and legal education in Russia, primarily the XX International Scientific and Theoretical Conference “State and law: evolution, current state, development prospects (for the 25th anniversary of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation), which took place on April 27–28, 2023 at the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 433 researchers – scientists and practitioners – citizens of Russia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan took part in the conference in full-time and correspondence format. The geography of the Russian participants of the conference is wide, sending their works from 53 cities. On the section of young researchers, the winners of the report competition were awarded diplomas. The issues raised for discussion at the conference received diverse coverage.
Introduction. The article describes the discussion at the 20th international scientifictheoretical conference “State and Law: Evolution, Current State, Development Prospects (to the 25th Anniversary of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia)” (2023) held at St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 433 researchers took part in the discussion of actual issues of modern legal science. These are scientists and practitioners of Russia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan. The participants presented the views on the peculiarities of the modern stage of development of national legal science - postclassical (post-neoclassical) legal science; the importance of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity of legal research in the development of theoretical jurisprudence; updating the methodological basis of modern legal science; the dependence of the state of jurisprudence on the transformations of social reality; topical problems of legal understanding and legal regulation. Methods. The main methodological principles of the research were the principles of comprehensive study of legal processes and phenomena, integrity of theory and practice, historicism. The main methodological approaches of the research were defined as the system approach and the value approach. The last one contributed to the identification of the ideas important for the modern stage of development of legal science. The method of integrity made it possible to identify the features of the current state of legal science as a system of interrelated elements of legal knowledge and the reasons determining their change in the course of historiographical analysis. Results.The views of modern scientists on actual issues of modern jurisprudence are characterised: the specifics of the state of post-classical (postnon-classical) legal science (I. L. Chestnov); the features of the methodology of modern theoretical jurisprudence (N. V. Varlamova, M. L. Davydova, V. V. Denisenko, S. A. Kalinin, N. V. Mamchenko); the significance in the development of theoretical jurisprudence of the problem of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity (S. V. Kodan, I. A. Andreeva, E. N. Tonkov); the dependence of the state of modern theoretical jurisprudence on the instability of social reality (A. V. Skorobogatov, V. G. Zarubin, V. A. Semenov); the place of modern legal science in the disciplinary structure of social and humanitarian sciences (L. V. Denisova); structure of modern theoretical jurisprudence (V. Yu.Belsky, A. L. Zolkin, M. V. Baranova); features of legal understanding and law enforcement (R. I. Baigutlin, L. V. Karnaushenko, E. S. Zaitseva, D. A. Matantsev); organisational and legal determinants of the development of modern legal science (I. A. Goncharov, A. G. Repiev).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.