2017
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1327929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History repeats itself in Japan: Failure to learn from rubella epidemic leads to failure to provide the HPV vaccine

Abstract: Eradication of vaccine-preventable diseases is one of the most important goals of public health interventions. Herd immunity can be established by national vaccination programs. However, once the national vaccination program stops for any reason, unprotected group will be generated depending on an unfortunate year of birth. Currently, there are 2 major concerns regarding vaccine cohort gaps in Japan: one is for the rubella vaccine, the other for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To control rubella, vaccination is required (Zanetta et al, 2003;Wesolowski et al, 2016). As vaccination could elevate the age at infection (Amaku et al, 2003;Berger et al, 2011;Mossong et al, 2008;Tanaka et al, 2017;Saito et al, 2018), controversial routine immunization with low vaccination coverage is known to be accompanied by an increase in CRS (Best et al, 2005;Chua et al, 2015;Panagiotopoulos et al, 1999). To eliminate rubella by means of mass vaccination, high coverage of the entire population is required to attain sufficient herd immunity (Anderson and Grenfell, 1986;Massad et al, 1995;Panagiotopoulos et al, 1999;Cutts et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control rubella, vaccination is required (Zanetta et al, 2003;Wesolowski et al, 2016). As vaccination could elevate the age at infection (Amaku et al, 2003;Berger et al, 2011;Mossong et al, 2008;Tanaka et al, 2017;Saito et al, 2018), controversial routine immunization with low vaccination coverage is known to be accompanied by an increase in CRS (Best et al, 2005;Chua et al, 2015;Panagiotopoulos et al, 1999). To eliminate rubella by means of mass vaccination, high coverage of the entire population is required to attain sufficient herd immunity (Anderson and Grenfell, 1986;Massad et al, 1995;Panagiotopoulos et al, 1999;Cutts et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of reports of aseptic meningitis following the MMR vaccine, the Japanese government withdrew its recommendation for the MMR vaccine in 1993. [15] Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for girls ages 12–16 was first licensed in Japan in October 2009. Acceptance initially reached over 70%, but it fell to less than 1% after extensive media reports of possible adverse events.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rubella-containing vaccine termed the measles-rubella (MR) vaccine, was started in 2006, but was soon changed to two doses; one in the first year of life and the other in infancy, one year before entering elementary school (6)(7)(8). With the full reporting of measles and rubella cases that began in 2008 ( 9), rubella immunization retargeted male and female infants, focusing on the age group receiving inadequate immunization (8,(10)(11). Further, following the nationwide measles epidemic that began in 2007 mainly among people in their teens and twenties, a second round of vaccination with the MR vaccine was offered to those who were in their first year of junior high school and those equivalent to the age of high school seniors over a 5-year period from 2008 to 2012 to immunize these individuals against rubella, a disease that should be treated together with measles (12).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%