2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47804-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HiTaS: A Heuristic Approach to Cell Suppression in Hierarchical Tables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HiTaS method [18] was developed for tables with hierarchical structure. It is a top-down methodology to decompose a hierarchical table into subtables, and then solving the CSP for each subtable.…”
Section: Other Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HiTaS method [18] was developed for tables with hierarchical structure. It is a top-down methodology to decompose a hierarchical table into subtables, and then solving the CSP for each subtable.…”
Section: Other Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is efficient, in practice tends to oversuppress cells and, moreover, it does not guarantee a feasible solution (indeed, it finishes with some underprotected cells). Some of the above drawbacks are also shared by the other heuristic, named Hitas [19]. That approach decomposes any table in a tree of smaller two-dimensional subtables and locally protects them by the previously cited optimal Benders decomposition approach.…”
Section: Cell Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they can be run with the same table from the τ-Argus package, which implements four of them: the optimal approach of [24], the shortest paths heuristic of [9], and the two (infeasible) heuristics of [19] and [25]. To compare them, in [26] a toy table 1H2D was generated with τ-Argus.…”
Section: Cell Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular approach for hierarchical table cell suppression (also called HiTaS, see [2] for a detailed description) subdivides a hierarchical table T into the corresponding set S(T) of simple, 'unstructured' linked (sub-)tables. The cell suppression problem is solved for each subtable separately.…”
Section: The Original Modular Approach For Dealing With Hierarchical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Compute a partial suppression pattern for subtable T a where only cells suppressed in (1) are eligible for (partial) suppression. (3) Assign the distances between the bounds of intervals given by the partial suppression pattern and the cell value of any suppressed cell s of T a as protection level to s when protecting any other subtable T b containing cell s.…”
Section: Using Partial Suppression To Compute Protection Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%