2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hitting a support surface at unexpected height during walking induces loading transients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…losses inherent to impacts, increased muscle recruitment) and an increased risk (shock transmission). Such an increased impact peak has also been observed in walkers hitting a support surface at an unexpected height (van der Linden et al, 2009). The impact phase during walking is sometimes characterized by an early 'transient' loading peak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…losses inherent to impacts, increased muscle recruitment) and an increased risk (shock transmission). Such an increased impact peak has also been observed in walkers hitting a support surface at an unexpected height (van der Linden et al, 2009). The impact phase during walking is sometimes characterized by an early 'transient' loading peak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The impact phase during walking is sometimes characterized by an early 'transient' loading peak. This transient peak occurred more frequently when subjects were unaware of the level of the support surface and was related to shock absorption at foot contact and to a mismatch between the produced and, according to the authors, required muscle force at the moment of impact (van der Linden et al, 2009). Furthermore, we observed 33% decreased leg stiffness and 6% decreased angle of attack at CL (compared with VL).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The human gait data involves impact forces at the leg touch-down, which introduces an additional behaviour in the GRF pattern [30,35,36]. In order to see the influence of the impact on VP, we are presenting our recorded data in two ways.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For walking on uneven ground, when human walkers encounter a drop, they modulate their GRF kinetics proportional with the drop height not only in the perturbation step, but also in the approach step to the perturbation ( Müller, et al, 2014 ). However, the quality and quantity of the kinetic and kinematic adaptations or reactions to external perturbations are context-specific ( Müller, et al, 2014 ; van der Linden, et al 2009 , 2007 ). While these studies have analysed human walking with various trunk configurations or adaptive and reactive kinetic mechanisms in pre-perturbation and perturbation contacts and made comparisons with avian locomotor behaviour, to our knowledge, kinetic and kinematic adaptations when stepping down (perturbation) and in pre- and post-perturbation steps with different bent postures have not been investigated yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%