2006
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m601128200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV-1 Nef Selectively Activates Src Family Kinases Hck, Lyn, and c-Src through Direct SH3 Domain Interaction

Abstract: Nef is an HIV-1 virulence factor that promotes viral pathogenicity by altering host cell signaling pathways. Nef binds several members of the Src kinase family, and these interactions have been implicated in the pathogenesis of HIV/AIDS. However, the direct effect of Nef interaction on Src family kinase (SFK) regulation and activity has not been systematically addressed. We explored this issue using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a well defined model system for the study of SFK regulation. Previous studies have sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
188
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
13
188
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 that CSK inhibits SFKs only by phosphorylating their Y T (the catalytic mechanism), whereas CHK can employ both catalytic and non-catalytic inhibitory mechanisms to suppress SFK activity. Nevertheless, we cannot conclude from our findings that CHK is more important than CSK for SFK suppression in vivo because regulation of SFKs by CHK and CSK is governed by many factors including (i) the subcellular localization of CSK, CHK, and SFKs, (ii) catalytic efficiency of CSK and CHK in phosphorylating Y T of SFKs, and (iii) interaction of SFKs with activator proteins such as HIV-1 Nef and autophosphorylated FAK (18,37). Furthermore, contributions of these factors may vary in different cell types and under different physiological states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…7 that CSK inhibits SFKs only by phosphorylating their Y T (the catalytic mechanism), whereas CHK can employ both catalytic and non-catalytic inhibitory mechanisms to suppress SFK activity. Nevertheless, we cannot conclude from our findings that CHK is more important than CSK for SFK suppression in vivo because regulation of SFKs by CHK and CSK is governed by many factors including (i) the subcellular localization of CSK, CHK, and SFKs, (ii) catalytic efficiency of CSK and CHK in phosphorylating Y T of SFKs, and (iii) interaction of SFKs with activator proteins such as HIV-1 Nef and autophosphorylated FAK (18,37). Furthermore, contributions of these factors may vary in different cell types and under different physiological states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…4B, 6B). The prolinerich motif of Nef was shown to bind the Src homology 3 (SH3) domains of a subset of cellular Src family tyrosine kinases, such as Hck, Lyn, and possibly c-Src (47)(48)(49)63). Among them, the interaction with Hck is important because it causes the activation of Hck kinase activity (47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 has been shown to activate Hck, Lyn, and c-Src but not Fgr, Fyn, Lck, or Yes (33,52). The structural determinant for the activation of Hck has been mapped to the variable loop (RT loop), which is positioned close to the conserved SH3 residues implicated in the binding of proline-rich motifs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%