HIV-1 transmission and survival according to feeding options in infants born to HIV-infected women in Yaoundé, Cameroon

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence of 24-months survival in the frame of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) cascade-care is scare from routine programs in sub-Saharan African (SSA) settings. Specifically, data on infant outcomes according to feeding options remain largely unknown by month-24, thus limiting its breath for public-health recommendations toward eliminating new pediatric HIV-1 infections and improving care. We sought to evaluate HIV-1 vertical transmission and infant survival rates according to feeding options.MethodsA retrospective cohort-study conducted in Yaounde from April 2008 through December 2013 among 1086 infants born to HIV-infected women and followed-up throughout the PMTCT cascade-care until 24-months. Infants with documented feeding option during their first 3 months of life (408 on Exclusive Breastfeeding [EBF], 663 Exclusive Replacement feeding [ERF], 15 mixed feeding [MF]) and known HIV-status were enrolled. HIV-1 vertical transmission, survival and feeding options were analyzed using Kaplan Meier Survival Estimate, Cox model and Schoenfeld residuals tests, at 5% statistical significance.ResultsOverall HIV-1 vertical transmission was 3.59% (39), and varied by feeding options: EBF (2.70%), ERF (3.77%), MF (20%), p = 0.002; without significance between EBF and ERF (p = 0.34). As expected, HIV-1 transmission also varied with PMTCT-interventions: 1.7% (10/566) from ART-group, 1.9% (8/411) from AZT-group, and 19.2% (21/109) from ARV-naïve group, p < 0.0001. Overall mortality was 2.58% (28), higher in HIV-infected (10.25%) vs. uninfected (2.29%) infants (p = 0.016); with a survival cumulative probability of 89.3% [79.9%–99.8%] vs. 96.4% [94.8%–97.9% respectively], p = 0.024. Mortality also varied by feeding option: ERF (2.41%), EBF (2.45%), MF (13.33%), p = 0.03; with a survival cumulative probability of 96% [94%–98%] in ERF, 96.4% [94.1%–98.8%] in EBF, and 86.67% [71.06%–100%] in MF, p = 0.04. Using Schoenfeld residuals test, only HIV status was a predictor of survival at 24 months (hazard ratio 0.23 [0.072–0.72], p = 0.01).ConclusionBesides using ART for PMTCT-interventions, practice of MF also drives HIV-1 vertical transmission and mortality among HIV-infected children. Thus, throughout PMTCT option B+ cascade-care, continuous counseling on safer feeding options would to further eliminating new MTCT, optimizing response to care, and improving the life expectancy of these children in high-priority countries.

A Review and Analysis of Outcomes from Prevention of Mother-to- Child Transmission of HIV Infant Follow-up Services at a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit of a Major Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: 2007-2020

“…MF was still a significant factor in MTCT despite the administration of ARVs. This was attested to by other studies showing MTCT rates in excess of 20% with MF, 20 , 25 and even up to 60%. 26 Afolabi et al 27 noted MF as an important predictor in which the risk of MTCT was about two times higher compared to EBF.…”

A comparative, correlate analysis and projection of global and regional life expectancy, healthy life expectancy, and their GAP: 1995-2025

“…GAP in 4 countries and regions decreased. These regions’ GAP decreased accompanied with LE and HALE increased during the last decade as medical advancements and breakthroughs in preventing HIV pediatric infections and mother-to-child transmission were widely implemented [ 18 ]. The absolute narrowing of the GAP did not mean that the health level of a country had reached the expected level.…”

A Nationwide Antenatal Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type-1 Antibody Screening in Japan

“…Regardless of its duration, breastfeeding may also be combined with the use of infant formula. In recent studies of MTCT of HIV, MTCT rates with ordinary breastfeeding and ExFF were 2.70 and 3.77%, respectively, compared to 20.0% with mixed feeding (Njom Nlend et al, 2018). It is speculated that mixed feeding may cause gastrointestinal mucosal injury or dysbiosis, which may involve changes in intestinal permeability (O'Sullivan et al, 2015).…”