2010
DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV/HBV co-infection and rate of antiretroviral treatment change after highly active antiretroviral treatment initiation in a cohort of HIV-infected patients in Greece

Abstract: The current study investigated the impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection on the rate of change of antiretroviral drugs after the initiation of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). The data on 1425 HIV-positive patients with recorded serology for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were retrospectively analysed. The estimated rate of treatment change was slightly higher in the HBsAg-positive group (0.57 per year) compared with the HBsAg-negative group (0.50… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant difference found among exposure groups. Unlike some other studies, 32,33 the current study found no gender difference in HIV infection and gender did not show an association with HCV infection in a multivariate logistic regression model, although there were more male than female HBV infections in HIV-infected patients. No risk factors associated with HBV infection were found in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no significant difference found among exposure groups. Unlike some other studies, 32,33 the current study found no gender difference in HIV infection and gender did not show an association with HCV infection in a multivariate logistic regression model, although there were more male than female HBV infections in HIV-infected patients. No risk factors associated with HBV infection were found in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%