2013
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2012.0082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV Non-B Subtype Distribution: Emerging Trends and Risk Factors for Imported and Local Infections Newly Diagnosed in South Australia

Abstract: (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003) to 64% (2007-2010) ( p = 0.007) and correspondingly the proportion of subtype B declined from 85% to 68% ( p = 0.002). Non-B infections were predominantly (83%) heterosexual contacts, mostly acquired overseas (74%). The majority (68%) of non-B patients were born outside of Australia. There was a nonsignificant increase from 1.6% to 4.2% in the proportion of locally transmitted non-B cases (p = 0.3). Three non-B subtypes and two circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) were identified: CRF_… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brazil, the Caribbean, and Thailand) could likely be responsible for the entry of an array of group M subtypes into formerly subtype B-restricted geographic areas and, consequently, contributing for the changing profile of the local HIV epidemiology in host countries (Rice et al, 2012). As similarly reported in other studies in Italy (Lai et al, 2010) and elsewhere (Hawke et al, 2012;von Wyl et al, 2011), in the present paper, the totality of non-B infections among immigrant subjects correlate to heterosexual transmission, while non-B infections in homosexual individuals were exclusively found in Italian-born patients. Of note, native Italians who were infected with HIV-1 non-B strains mainly harboured URFs while known CRFs/subtypes were found only in a minority group of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Brazil, the Caribbean, and Thailand) could likely be responsible for the entry of an array of group M subtypes into formerly subtype B-restricted geographic areas and, consequently, contributing for the changing profile of the local HIV epidemiology in host countries (Rice et al, 2012). As similarly reported in other studies in Italy (Lai et al, 2010) and elsewhere (Hawke et al, 2012;von Wyl et al, 2011), in the present paper, the totality of non-B infections among immigrant subjects correlate to heterosexual transmission, while non-B infections in homosexual individuals were exclusively found in Italian-born patients. Of note, native Italians who were infected with HIV-1 non-B strains mainly harboured URFs while known CRFs/subtypes were found only in a minority group of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…HIV‐1 subtype B has been the predominant subtype circulating in Australia, particularly among MSM. Although there are no national data on HIV subtypes according to risk group, between 2000–2010 in South Australia, 95% of MSM had HIV subtype B; in Victoria, 15% of men had non‐B subtypes 9–11 . Non‐B subtypes such as CRF01=AE have generally been associated with HIV acquisition from sexual partners in Asia or specific networks within Australia 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16% of non‐B subtypes found in Australian men may ostensibly reflect HIV transmission between Australian and Asian men. It is not known whether Asian men who acquired their HIV in Australia acquired their infection from Australian men or other recently arrived Asian men, although limited phylogenetic analyses in Victoria support transmission networks of non‐B subtypes within Australia 10 . Further phylogenetic studies could help clarify the extent to which new HIV infections in Australia are acquired locally or from overseas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contiguous pol sequence was generated spanning the protease (PR, amino acid positions 1–99 in HXB2) and reverse transcriptase region (RT, amino acid positions 20–240 in HXB2) sequences were amplified using in-house techniques (Western Australia [31], South Australia [32], Victoria [33], and western Sydney) or commercially available methods (Queensland; Viroseq HIV-1 Genotyping System, Abbott Celera). The HIV-1 subtype determinations were assigned by each state by submitting the fasta files to the calibrated population resistance tool (HIV db program) linked to the Stanford HIV database (http://hivdb.stanford.edu/) with the exception of Victoria who confirmed subtypes by submitting sequences to the Los Alamos database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov) and the NCBI HIV genotyping tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/genotyping/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%