2010
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV Protease Inhibitors, Indinavir or Nelfinavir, Augment Antimalarial Action of Artemisinin in vitro

Abstract: Abstract. Most malaria endemic regions are co-infested with HIV infection. Treatment of one may affect outcome of the other in co-infected individuals. HIV protease inhibitors, indinavir or nelfinavir, are important antiretroviral drugs and artemisinin is central to malaria treatment. We show these protease inhibitors augment the antimalarial activity of artemisinin against P. falciparum in vitro .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear whether differences in results between our groups are due to the different protease inhibitors studied, differences in methodology, or other factors. Other groups have reported synergy (29) or antagonism (16) between HIV protease inhibitors and artemisinins, although only older protease inhibitors and not lopinavir were studied; we found additive effects between lopinavir and dihydroartemisinin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unclear whether differences in results between our groups are due to the different protease inhibitors studied, differences in methodology, or other factors. Other groups have reported synergy (29) or antagonism (16) between HIV protease inhibitors and artemisinins, although only older protease inhibitors and not lopinavir were studied; we found additive effects between lopinavir and dihydroartemisinin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Indeed, in normal volunteers, exposure to the antimalarial lumefantrine, a component of the ACT artemether-lumefantrine, was markedly enhanced by coadministration of lopinavirritonavir (12), and exposure to a number of other antimalarial drugs may be affected by ritonavir or other agents (41). Considering antimalarial efficacy, HIV protease inhibitors have been shown to potentiate the activity of chloroquine (14,15,23) and to either augment (29) or antagonize (16) the activity of artemisinins. To help clarify the impacts of antiretroviral therapy on malaria, we systematically evaluated the activity of representatives of all currently used classes of antiretroviral drugs against two strains of P. falciparum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malaria infection was more prevalent in women on nevirapine‐based therapy than those on nelfinavir‐based therapy. This difference may have been due to nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor known to have antimalarial properties , given that there was no difference in malaria prevalence before and after the introduction of bed nets. Again, there was no difference in prevalence of malaria in women with CD4 < 250, all on nevirapine‐based therapy, before and after bed net introduction, supporting the antimalarial effect of nelfinavir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to studies in adults that are designed to directly address whether PIs have a beneficial effect on malaria in regions where malaria is endemic and the prevalence of HIV-1 is high, further research is warranted to determine the effects of HIV PIs on malaria in children and pregnant women, two groups that are at greater risk for clinical malaria. In addition, since laboratory evidence suggests that the coadministration of HIV PIs with additional antimalarial agents, including chloroquine or mefloquine, may enhance the antimalarial activity of these drugs (16,23,31), the utility of such combinations also warrants further research. In conclusion, the results from our analyses, which were not consistent with large a decreased hazard of clinical malaria in subjects receiving LPV/r-based ART, provide evidence, albeit preliminary and imperfect, that supports the possibility of no or little effect of LPV/r-based therapy on clinical malaria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%