2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13027-019-0263-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV status, age at cervical Cancer screening and cervical cytology outcomes in an opportunistic screening setting in Nigeria: a 10-year Cross sectional data analysis

Abstract: BackgroundInvasive cervical cancer (ICC) is more prevalent in HIV infected women and occurs at younger median age than in HIV negative women. Organized cervical cancer screening (CCS) is presently lacking in Nigeria, and the age at CCS is not known in this population. We sought to examine the age at CCS, the cytology outcomes and whether outcomes differ by HIV infection status in an opportunistic screening setting.MethodsCross-sectional analysis of data on a sample of women who had received a CCS in an opportu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, women with higher parity ≥3 at rst Pap test with normal cytology were 1.65 times more likely to develop an ECA at follow-up Pap test compared to women with a lower parity. We have previously documented in the same screening population in Jos that cervical cancer screening at age 35 or more, and in women with high parity was associated with higher odd for an underlying abnormal cervical cytology outcome irrespective of HIV status [16]. The ndings of the effect of multiparity on the development of an ECA on subsequent follow up Pap test is corroborated by reports on the cofactors in cervical pre-cancer and progression to invasive cervical cancer that women of parity 3 or more were signi cantly more likely to have pre-cancer compared to nulliparous women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, women with higher parity ≥3 at rst Pap test with normal cytology were 1.65 times more likely to develop an ECA at follow-up Pap test compared to women with a lower parity. We have previously documented in the same screening population in Jos that cervical cancer screening at age 35 or more, and in women with high parity was associated with higher odd for an underlying abnormal cervical cytology outcome irrespective of HIV status [16]. The ndings of the effect of multiparity on the development of an ECA on subsequent follow up Pap test is corroborated by reports on the cofactors in cervical pre-cancer and progression to invasive cervical cancer that women of parity 3 or more were signi cantly more likely to have pre-cancer compared to nulliparous women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The possible explanation for the observed convergence could be related to the documented higher risk of development of ECA with advancing age with longer follow up Pap test. [16] Also, our analysis focused on the age at rst CCS rather than adjusting for change in age at the time of outcome assessment. In future research, data on the age at outcome assessment should be collected and modelled as a time-varying covariate to have a better understanding of the effect of age on development of ECA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2,3] Proven and cost-effective measures for eliminating cervical cancer such as avoidance of risk factors, HPV vaccination, papanicolaou screening( pap smear) and treatment of precancerous lesions exist, but to date have not been widely implemented in regions of the world where the disease burden is highest. [2][3][4][5][6] In Nigeria as in other sub-Saharan African countries there is no organized screening program, and the few services available are only opportunistic with little or no impact. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Development of cervical cancer screening policy and institution of organized screening program targeted at covering ≥ 80% of population at risk is fundamental.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%