2013
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV testing in medical admissions is a missed opportunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with research which indicates increased normalization of testing [20]. Nevertheless, clinical audits suggest that there remain missed opportunities for testing among both general medical admissions [8] and patients in general practice [10,11]. The results of this audit confirm that routine HIV testing in these settings has been commissioned in only a minority of high-prevalence areas, and prioritizing the introduction of routine testing in these settings will be necessary to fully implement national testing guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with research which indicates increased normalization of testing [20]. Nevertheless, clinical audits suggest that there remain missed opportunities for testing among both general medical admissions [8] and patients in general practice [10,11]. The results of this audit confirm that routine HIV testing in these settings has been commissioned in only a minority of high-prevalence areas, and prioritizing the introduction of routine testing in these settings will be necessary to fully implement national testing guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Following the publication of the guidelines, it is not clear to what extent they have been implemented on a national level. While there is some evidence that an increasing proportion of tests are taking place outside of traditional settings, particularly in general practice , this has been from a low starting point and there are likely to remain missed opportunities for testing in nonspecialist medical settings .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to testing for HIV perceived by frontline staff were not investigated in this study, but feedback revealed factors similar to previous studies: HIV stigma [ 36 ], variability of uptake amongst consultants [ 17 ], inadequate financial and workforce infrastructure [ 37 ], and perceived inadequate skill set [ 20 ]. The last factor was particularly apparent during the junior doctor teaching sessions, and it has been shown that despite HIV medicine being on the 2009 national core curriculum, over two-thirds of junior doctors still feel they need further training to confidently test for HIV [ 28 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opt-out routine testing rates in “traditional” settings such as sexual health and ante-natal clinics have increased substantially since the UKNG [ 15 ]. There has also been some success in other “non-traditional” settings in the UK and Europe [ 16 28 ] (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%