2013
DOI: 10.1111/ced.12113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV testing in Scottish dermatology, a national audit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 An audit in 2012 compared the practice of HIV testing by UK dermatologists against national guidelines published by the British HIV Association (BHIVA). 4,5 These guidelines advise testing for HIV in all patients with severe/recalcitrant psoriasis or seborrhoeic dermatitis, multi-dermatomal/recalcitrant herpes zoster and suspected Kaposi's sarcoma. Rating the likelihood of HIV testing for specific skin conditions between 1 and 10 (1 ¼ never test, 10 ¼ always test), severe/recalcitrant psoriasis scored 5, and both severe/recalcitrant seborrhoeic dermatitis and multi-dermatomal/recalcitrant herpes zoster scored 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 An audit in 2012 compared the practice of HIV testing by UK dermatologists against national guidelines published by the British HIV Association (BHIVA). 4,5 These guidelines advise testing for HIV in all patients with severe/recalcitrant psoriasis or seborrhoeic dermatitis, multi-dermatomal/recalcitrant herpes zoster and suspected Kaposi's sarcoma. Rating the likelihood of HIV testing for specific skin conditions between 1 and 10 (1 ¼ never test, 10 ¼ always test), severe/recalcitrant psoriasis scored 5, and both severe/recalcitrant seborrhoeic dermatitis and multi-dermatomal/recalcitrant herpes zoster scored 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%