2010
DOI: 10.1086/657117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV Type 2 in New York City, 2000–2008

Abstract: HIV-2 should be ruled out in persons presenting for HIV testing who originate in or travel to West Africa and other areas in which HIV-2 is endemic, particularly those who have negative or indeterminate results on HIV-1 Western blot testing or have atypical banding patterns and/or present with clinical signs of HIV infection or unexplained immunosuppression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[76][77][78] It also occurs in countries such as France and Portugal, which have large numbers of immigrants from these regions. 79,80 HIV-1 and HIV-2 coinfections may also occur, but these are rare outside areas where HIV-2 is endemic.…”
Section: Virologic Assays To Diagnose Hiv-2 Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[76][77][78] It also occurs in countries such as France and Portugal, which have large numbers of immigrants from these regions. 79,80 HIV-1 and HIV-2 coinfections may also occur, but these are rare outside areas where HIV-2 is endemic.…”
Section: Virologic Assays To Diagnose Hiv-2 Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matter is further complicated by the fact that HIV exists as two serotypes, HIV-1 and HIV-2. While HIV-2 is primarily endemic in West Africa, global travel has greatly enhanced the geographical distribution of this serotype, including the spread to Europe and the United States (17,18). The distinction between HIV-1 and HIV-2 is important for several reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies document that high levels of HIV-1 RNA are present in persons with acute HIV infections that are detected by sensitive immunoassays but negative or indeterminate by Western blot [43•, 44-49]. Because of cross-reactivity, the HIV-1 Western blot was interpreted as positive for HIV-1 in 46 to 85 % of specimens from persons found to be infected with HIV-2, resulting in incorrect or delayed diagnosis [50][51][52]. Although HIV-2 remains uncommon in the USA, accurate diagnosis of HIV-2 is clinically important because some antiretroviral agents effective against HIV-1 (including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some protease inhibitors) are not effective against HIV-2 [53,54].…”
Section: Clinical and Public Health Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%