The utility of live attenuated vaccines for controlling HIV epidemics is being debated. Live attenuated HIV vaccines (LAHVs) could be extremely effective in protecting against infection with wild-type strains, but may not be completely safe as the attenuated strain could cause AIDS in some vaccinated individuals. We present a theoretical framework for evaluating the consequences of the tradeoff between vaccine efficacy (in terms of preventing new infections with wild-type strains) and safety (in terms of vaccineinduced AIDS deaths). We use our framework to predict, for Zimbabwe and Thailand, the epidemiological impact of 1,000 different (specified by efficacy and safety characteristics) LAHVs. We predict that paradoxically: (i) in Zimbabwe (where transmission is high) LAHVs would significantly decrease the AIDS death rate, but (ii) in Thailand (where transmission is low) exactly the same vaccines (in terms of efficacy and safety characteristics) would increase the AIDS death rate. Our results imply that a threshold transmission rate exists that determines whether any given LAHV has a beneficial or a detrimental impact. We also determine the vaccine perversity point, which is defined in terms of the fraction of vaccinated individuals who progress to AIDS as a result of the vaccine strain. Vaccination with any LAHV that causes more than 5% of vaccinated individuals to progress to AIDS in 25 years would, even 50 years later, lead to perversity (i.e., increase the annual AIDS death rate) in Thailand; these same vaccines would lead to decreases in the annual AIDS death rate in Zimbabwe.
Live attenuated vaccines (due to their high protective efficacy, low cost, and simple immunization schedules) have been used successfully to control smallpox, polio, and measles epidemics (1, 2). Preliminary attempts have been made to develop a live attenuated HIV vaccine (LAHV) (3-6); however, the debate about the potential utility of developing LAHVs has been controversial, mainly due to concerns that have arisen about vaccine safety (3, 4, 7-9). The major safety concern is that even a very attenuated strain of HIV (if used as a LAHV) could actually cause AIDS in some fraction of vaccinated individuals (4, 5). Live attenuated polio vaccine has caused some cases of paralytic poliomyelitis (10), and any live attenuated vaccine has the potential to cause disease. Studies in macaques of the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus have shown that live attenuated strains can be highly effective in protecting against infection with the wild-type strain (4, 11), but that some macaques develop AIDS as a result of the attenuated strain (5, 12). Concern about the potential safety of LAHVs has been heightened by a recent report of the natural history of HIV infection in a cohort of gay men in Australia (13). Some of these men were infected with a naturally attenuated strain of HIV. Long-term follow-up studies of this cohort have shown that this strain of HIV, although attenuated, can cause immune deterioration (13). The design of a LAHV t...