2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIV Viral Load Trends in Six Eastern Caribbean Countries Utilizing a Regional Laboratory Referral Service: Implications for Treatment as Prevention

Abstract: ObjectiveSince 2009, seven countries in the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), Antigua & Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts & Nevis, Saint Lucia, and St. Vincent & the Grenadines, have been utilizing a laboratory referral service for HIV-1 viral load (VL) offered by The Ladymeade Reference Unit (LRU) Laboratory, Barbados. The objective of this study was to evaluate 5 year VL trends in the six larger OECS countries participating in this regional referral service.MethodsBlood samples… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 67 Several of the smaller islands in the Caribbean, that are not equipped to conduct molecular diagnostics, have complained that HIV viral load monitoring through established laboratory referral networks is no longer being supported through international funding partners. 69 …”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 67 Several of the smaller islands in the Caribbean, that are not equipped to conduct molecular diagnostics, have complained that HIV viral load monitoring through established laboratory referral networks is no longer being supported through international funding partners. 69 …”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By including the number of HIV negative people in the denominator of the mean community viral load calculation, we argue that the definition would better reflect community risk and be relevant for monitoring HIV transmission risk and the effectiveness of prevention activities. Despite this concern, studies continue to measure community viral load not accounting for the prevalence of HIV and the CDC guidelines remain unchanged since 2011 [12, 15, 16]. This study seeks to demonstrate the importance of adjusting for HIV prevalence in community viral load measures by comparing the association between community viral load and HIV incidence under two definitions (mean community viral load and prevalence-adjusted community viral load) to evaluate their use in community surveillance and TasP evaluation activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%