2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-3274(03)00017-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1 matching heterogeneity in ‘favourably matched’ kidney recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental and clinical data suggest that other classical and non-classical loci also influence outcomes after organ transplantation. [31][32][33][34] The heterogeneity of the MHC (and HLA in particular) makes allocation of organs by all MHC gene products unrealistic. Yet, despite the variability of MHC and HLA, the limited HLA MM in the current study significantly influenced outcomes after lung transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and clinical data suggest that other classical and non-classical loci also influence outcomes after organ transplantation. [31][32][33][34] The heterogeneity of the MHC (and HLA in particular) makes allocation of organs by all MHC gene products unrealistic. Yet, despite the variability of MHC and HLA, the limited HLA MM in the current study significantly influenced outcomes after lung transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is explained by the higher accuracy of genotyping, which corrected the previous serological errors. Although the three mismatch-defining HLA gene loci A, B, and DR are regarded as the most important criteria, an increasing number of studies have discovered the adverse effects of graft survival in pre-sensitized recipients due to other mismatched HLA-loci [20][21][22][23][24]. Research provides evidence that a high degree of compatibility, including all polymorphous HLA-gene loci, is an important aspect for medium-term (one up to five years) and long-term (more than five years) graft survival and exceedingly for successful regrafting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rees et al (14) observed that if renal recipients and their donors were matched for HLA-B, more than 60% were also matched for HLA-C, and conversely, if there was a mismatch for HLA-B, 85% of the recipient/donor pairs were also mismatched for HLA-C. To exclude the possibility that an HLA-C mismatch effect could be masked by the consequence of an HLA-B mismatch, we based our current analysis on transplants that were matched for HLA-B, thereby increasing the likelihood of revealing a true impact of HLA-C incompatibility in kidney transplantation. Moreover, we used molecular methods for the accurate determination of HLA-C specificities in donor and recipient because serological HLA-C typing has been shown to be afflicted with a high technical error rate (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further aspect to be taken into consideration is the strong linkage disequilibrium between HLA-C and HLA-B (13). As a consequence, an HLA-C mismatch is often associated with an HLA-B mismatch (14). It is therefore conceivable that a potential (presumably weak) influence of HLA-C mismatch may be masked by the (stronger) adverse effect of HLA-B mismatch on allograft survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%