2000
DOI: 10.1177/109114210002800306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hmos and Health Externalities: A Local Public Good Perspective

Abstract: This article introduces a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) model that characterizes HMO decisions on enrollment, utilization levels, and quality. Facing global budgets dependent on revenue raising capacity, HMOs must determine standards of care and the corresponding premiums to cover costs. Revenues are allocated among HMO providers by gatekeepers who are often subject to strict utilization controls. Our model identifies various uncompensated health and pecuniary externalities that may result from patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, supply-side effects could cut in the opposite direction if patient turnover reduces the attractiveness of these future cost savings. In this regard, Goodman and Stano [36] have noted that high disenrollment rates cause HMOs to under appreciate the benefits of their treatment decisions, leading to an under provision of treatment relative to the socially optimal level. Demand-side factors would come in to play if HMO enrollees have differential access to care and/or out-of-pocket expenses.…”
Section: Estimation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, supply-side effects could cut in the opposite direction if patient turnover reduces the attractiveness of these future cost savings. In this regard, Goodman and Stano [36] have noted that high disenrollment rates cause HMOs to under appreciate the benefits of their treatment decisions, leading to an under provision of treatment relative to the socially optimal level. Demand-side factors would come in to play if HMO enrollees have differential access to care and/or out-of-pocket expenses.…”
Section: Estimation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For empirical studies that seek to develop forecast equations, these problems are a source of great concern. (p. 36) As a growing body of literature attests [39][40][41], estimation with weak instruments can lead to quite serious bias and errors in inference. Fortunately, we are able to obtain good instruments in this study.…”
Section: Estimation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This attention covers a broad spectrum of topics, ranging from hospital costs, profitability, and efficiency issues to medical malpractice to physician staffing to health care inflation (Chirikos, 1998-99;Daniels & Gatsonis, 1999;Given, 1996;Glied, 2003;Goodman & Stano, 2000;Jordan, 2001;Karsten, 1995;Okunade, 2001Okunade, , 2003Olsen, 1996). These issues notwithstanding, the issue that has received the greatest growth in attention is that of health insurance coverage (Bharmal & Thomas, 2005;Cebula, 2006;Cutler, 1994;Dushi & Honig, 2003;Frick & Bopp, 2005;Gruber, 2003;Harris & Keane, 1999;Kronick & Gilmer, 2002;Newhouse, 1994;Nyman, 2003;Swartz, 2001Swartz, , 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics debated range from hospital costs, profitability, and efficiency issues to medical malpractice to physician staffing to the health care inflation rate (Chirikos, 1998-99;Daniels and Gatsonis, 1999;Given, 1996;Glied, 2003;Goodman and Stano, 2000;Hart et al, 1997;Jordan, 2001;Karsten, 1995;Koch, 1992;Okunade, 2001Okunade, , 2003Olsen, 1996).One of the most important and contentious issues in U.S. healthcare that has received the greatest increase in attention in recent years is health insurance coverage (Bharmal and Thomas, 2005;Bundorf and Pauly, 2002;Cebula, 2006;Dushi and Honig, 2003;Frick and Bopp, 2005;Gruber, 2003;Harris and Keane, 1999;Holahan et al, 2003;Kronick and Gilmer, 2002;Marstellar et al, 1998;de Meza, 1983;Newhouse, 1994;Nyman, 2003;Swartz, 2001;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%