2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2005.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ho's theorem in global–local mode interaction of pin-jointed bar structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, once the preprocessor phase of the analysis has been performed (Steps (1)-(4)), the presence of small loading imperfections or geometrical defects can be taken into account in the postprocessing phase (Step (5)), by adding some additional imperfection terms in the expression of µ k [λ], with a negligible computational extra cost, so allowing an inexpensive imperfection sensitivity analysis (for example, see [Lanzo and Garcea 1996;]). From (6h) we can also extract information about the worst imperfection shapes [Salerno and Casciaro 1997;Salerno and Uva 2006] we can use to improve the imperfection sensitivity analysis or for driving more detailed investigations through specialized pathfollowing analysis (see [Casciaro 2005;Casciaro and Mancusi 2006] and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, once the preprocessor phase of the analysis has been performed (Steps (1)-(4)), the presence of small loading imperfections or geometrical defects can be taken into account in the postprocessing phase (Step (5)), by adding some additional imperfection terms in the expression of µ k [λ], with a negligible computational extra cost, so allowing an inexpensive imperfection sensitivity analysis (for example, see [Lanzo and Garcea 1996;]). From (6h) we can also extract information about the worst imperfection shapes [Salerno and Casciaro 1997;Salerno and Uva 2006] we can use to improve the imperfection sensitivity analysis or for driving more detailed investigations through specialized pathfollowing analysis (see [Casciaro 2005;Casciaro and Mancusi 2006] and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Eq. (1h) we can also extract information about the worst imperfection shapes [20,21] that we can use to improve the imperfection sensitivity analysis or for driving more detailed investigations through specialized path-following analysis [22].…”
Section: The Asymptotic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, once the preprocessor phase of the analysis has been performed (Steps (1)-(4)), the presence of small loading imperfections or geometrical defects can be taken into account in the postprocessing phase (Step (5)), by adding some additional imperfection terms in the expression of µ k [λ], with a negligible computational extra cost, so allowing an inexpensive imperfection sensitivity analysis (for example, see [Lanzo and Garcea 1996;]). From (6h) we can also extract information about the worst imperfection shapes [Salerno and Casciaro 1997;Salerno and Uva 2006] we can use to improve the imperfection sensitivity analysis or for driving more detailed investigations through specialized pathfollowing analysis (see Casciaro and Mancusi 2006] and references therein).…”
Section: Numerical Strategies In Nonlinear Fem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%