2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp20334g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HO2 formation from the OH + benzene reaction in the presence of O2

Abstract: In this study we investigated the secondary formation of HO 2 following the benzene + OH reaction in N 2 with variable O 2 content at atmospheric pressure and room temperature in the absence of NO. After pulsed formation of OH, HO x (= OH + HO 2 ) and OH decay curves were measured by means of a laser-induced fluorescence technique (LIF). In synthetic air the total HO 2 yield was determined to be 0.69 AE 0.10 by comparison to results obtained with CO as a reference compound. HO 2 is expected to be a direct prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11) in the radical source as suggested by Peeters et al (2009) and da Silva et al (2010) within the time between formation and detection of RO 2 radicals (20 ms). This upper limit would be consistent with the limit of the rate constant for the 1,6-H-shift given by Peeters et al (2009), which converts to a lifetime of 120 ms, but does not fit to results obtained by Nehr et al (2011), who investigated prompt HO 2 formation on a time scale of one second. However, the same authors lowered recently the estimate for the rate constant to 0.1 s −1 (Peeters and Muller, 2010).…”
Section: Interference From Ro 2 Produced By Isoprene + Oh and Its Oxisupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11) in the radical source as suggested by Peeters et al (2009) and da Silva et al (2010) within the time between formation and detection of RO 2 radicals (20 ms). This upper limit would be consistent with the limit of the rate constant for the 1,6-H-shift given by Peeters et al (2009), which converts to a lifetime of 120 ms, but does not fit to results obtained by Nehr et al (2011), who investigated prompt HO 2 formation on a time scale of one second. However, the same authors lowered recently the estimate for the rate constant to 0.1 s −1 (Peeters and Muller, 2010).…”
Section: Interference From Ro 2 Produced By Isoprene + Oh and Its Oxisupporting
confidence: 47%
“…However, in contrast to alkoxy peroxy radicals, decomposition and isomerization appear to be the dominant pathways, except for the HOCH 2 CH 2 O radical (from ethene plus OH), for which decomposition and reaction with O 2 can be competitive (Atkinson, 1997a). Decomposition rate constants were determined to be on the order of 10 4 to 10 6 s −1 (Atkinson, 1997a,b;Orlando et al, 1998;Vereecken et al, 1999). Decomposition leads to the formation of a hydroxyalkyl radical, which then reacts rapidly and solely with O 2 forming a carbonyl compound plus HO 2 (Atkinson, 1997b;Orlando et al, 2003).…”
Section: Interference From β-Hydroxyalkyl Peroxy Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in the Wangdu campaign, chemical modulation was applied on several occasions to test whether the OH measurements obtained normally by laser wavelength modulation are perturbed by artificial OH formation in the detection cell. Such kind of in-terference has been detected in some LIF instruments by applying chemical modulation in field campaigns (Mao et al, 2012;Novelli et al, 2014;Feiner et al, 2016). The chemical modulation system used at Wangdu and Heshan consisted of a flow tube in front of the OH measurement cell and allowed the scavenging of ambient OH by addition of propane in the sampled air flow.…”
Section: Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible reason for the high OH observations could be an interference in the OH measurements. Artifacts of up to 80 % have been reported when OH was measured by laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) in forest environments (Mao et al, 2012;Hens et al, 2014;Novelli et al, 2014;Feiner et al, 2016). The interference was presumably caused by oxidation products of biogenic VOCs in the measuring system and was quantified by chemical modulation of ambient OH before the measured air enters the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For OH + VOC reactions that lead to the production of HO 2 with a yield of y (OH + benzene and toluene for example; Klotz et al, 1998;Nehr et al, 2011), the OH to RO 2 conversion efficiency (C OH+VOC ) must be multiplied by the overall yield (1 − y) of RO 2 radicals produced from the OH + VOC reaction. Taking this yield into account, the signals due to RO 2 and HO 2 radicals become…”
Section: Measurement Of the Ro 2 Conversion Efficiency To Homentioning
confidence: 99%