2016
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2016.1152197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hoards as collections: re-examining the Snettisham Iron Age hoards from the perspective of collecting practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever their purpose, the selection of objects for inclusion in the hoards was deliberate and the performance of their deposition in the pit likely carried significance and meaning to those present. As discussed in more detail elsewhere (Joy ), the collection and selection of artefacts for inclusion in prehistoric hoards was an important process which is often overlooked by archaeologists.…”
Section: Of Its Generation? the Context Of Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever their purpose, the selection of objects for inclusion in the hoards was deliberate and the performance of their deposition in the pit likely carried significance and meaning to those present. As discussed in more detail elsewhere (Joy ), the collection and selection of artefacts for inclusion in prehistoric hoards was an important process which is often overlooked by archaeologists.…”
Section: Of Its Generation? the Context Of Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of hoarding these objects also has implications for the role the coins played in Iron Age lives since hoarding has been argued to result in the bringing together of people (Garrow & Gosden 2012,191). The social importance of the collection or accumulation of the group of objects must therefore be considered, not just the act of deposition itself (Joy 2016). Accumulating all coins of same issue region and nearly all attributed to the same 'ruler' or person suggests a common understanding surrounding these objects; they may now be considered as abductive icons and powerful actors in the extension and negotiation of social bonds.…”
Section: One Example From the Upper Thames Valley Is At The Hillfort mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, their diversity in form and distribution reflect the fluidity of social and political changes, as well as material traditions in the later British Iron Age. For example, coins were likely understood as part of existing (albeit shifting) concepts of late Iron Age, high-value metalwork exchange and deposition (Joy 2016). While this author does not refute Iron Age coins as powerful objects, exchanged between people for complex social and political reasons (Leins 2012), the discussion presented here builds upon the links made between coin imagery and cosmological beliefs in an attempt to understand better the types of power that may have been associated with them.…”
Section: Coins As Affective Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%